Conversations with Tyler

Tyler calls Terence Tao arguably the greatest mathematician of his generation: a Fields Medal winner who has published serious work across harmonic analysis, partial differential equations, number theory, probability, and compressed sensing, among many other fields. His new book, Six Math Essentials, is the occasion for this conversation, but Tyler spends much of it asking something more personal: not what the proofs say, but what they feel like. Tao's answers reveal a mathematician who treats beauty as a real signal, finds Gödel's incompleteness theorem genuinely unsettling even decades later, and is remarkably candid about failing both Fortran and quantum mechanics as an undergraduate.
Tyler opens by asking Terence what it feels like to contemplate Euler's identity, quantum mechanics, the Riemann hypothesis, and Gödel's incompleteness theorem, before moving into why mathematical history gets stripped out of classrooms, whether abstract math is a lottery ticket or a unified whole, string theory's beauty versus its lack of confirmation, why real analysis arrived so late, why zero took until the 7th century to be invented, game theory, the Black-Scholes model, Bostrom's simulation argument, and Newcomb's paradox, math education and the case for teaching more statistics, Tao's view that AI has pushed mathematics from an era of "proof scarcity" into "proof abundance," what that means for the research paper, why video talks may become more valuable than papers themselves, Tao's favorite Hong Kong action movies, his unconventional path through an Australian university at age 13, his most unusual work habit, his verdict on the Collatz conjecture, and more.
Read a transcript enhanced with helpful links, or watch the full video on YouTube.
Recorded October 8th, 2026.
Other ways to connect
Follow us on X and Instagram
Follow Tyler on X
Sign up for our newsletter
Join our Discord
Email us: cowenconvos@mercatus.gmu.edu 
Learn more about Conversations with Tyler and other Mercatus Center podcasts here.
Timestamps:
00:00:00 - Intro
00:01:06 - On math and emotions
00:08:19 - On the history of mathematics
00:09:15 - On abstract mathematics
00:10:55 - On string theory
00:12:27 - On geometry and analysis
00:14:38 - On zero
00:16:07 - On game theory and the limits of rationality
00:22:26 - On math education
00:28:41 - On the end of proof scarcity
00:32:35 - On the future of the math paper
00:36:22 - On Terence's education and habits
00:43:07 - Outro

Joseph Conrad's Nostromo, widely considered his masterpiece, follows a fictional Latin American country torn apart by corruption and its uneasy dependence on foreign capital. Tyler and Richard Hanania picked it hoping to talk about something other than politics — a bit ironic, given Hanania's new book, Kakistocracy: Why Populism Ends in Disaster, is all about the stupidity of current politics. From early on, the two see the novel quite differently: Is its hero a rotten fraud or a flawed but decent man? Is Conrad quietly a classical liberal, or a tragedian who thinks every political ideology curdles into "folly and murder"? Is comparing regimes even the right way to read him at all?
The first half of the conversation stays close to the text, covering the novel's political backdrop, its deliberately scrambled timeline, the near-total absence of religion in Conrad's universe, Nostromo's own vanity and treatment of women, a close reading of the "folly and murder" passage, the Fredric Jameson claim that no Latin American author could have written this book, and their very different research methods for preparing. Then the conversation opens outward, moving through why Latin America has unusually high crime despite not being especially poor, Panama's surprising success story, Shakespeare's objective greatness, the state of media criticism after the AI boom, who on the populist right is actually worth reading, why conservative women hug and liberal women shake hands, what Hanania wants to write and learn next, and more.
Read a transcript enhanced with helpful links, or watch the full video on YouTube.
Recorded June 16th, 2026.
Other ways to connect
Follow us on X and Instagram
Follow Tyler on X
Follow Richard on X
Sign up for our newsletter
Join our Discord
Email us: cowenconvos@mercatus.gmu.edu 
Learn more about Conversations with Tyler and other Mercatus Center podcasts here.
Timestamps:
00:00:00 - Intro
00:01:18 - On the context of Nostromo
00:23:32 - On Nostromo's scrambled timeline
00:24:59 - On the absence of religion in Nostromo
00:27:15 - On romanticizing politics
00:30:14 - On writing about Latin America
00:34:18 - On reading Conrad's works
00:39:01 - On crime in Latin America
00:44:10 - On Shakespeare's objective greatness
00:49:05 - On the media after the AI boom
00:51:16 - On populism
01:00:00 - On what's next
01:02:30 - Outro

Roman Mars has built one of podcasting's great empires out of noticing things everyone else walks past. His show, 99% Invisible, has racked up over 500 million downloads telling stories about the unnoticed design choices that quietly shape how cities and objects work, from speed bump psychology and flag design to the shape of a good street sign. His TED Talk on vexillology (the study of flags) is so influential that it has reportedly spurred 250 to 300 municipal flag redesigns across the country, including in Pocatello, Idaho, a city he once publicly called out for having the worst flag in America. Tyler asked questions about nearly every visual surface of modern life, and Mars's answers keep circling back to the same tension: beauty and efficiency are often at odds, and most of what looks ugly to us is just a compromise we haven't yet learned to love.
Tyler and Roman discuss street signs, why classic cars were so much more distinctive than today's SUVs, Waymos, New Jersey jughandles, yellow streetlights, lane-stripe colors, why Houston keeps growing despite its lack of charm, whether any post-war American suburb is actually beautiful, the Chrysler Building's rocky reception, brutalism done right and wrong, Central Park as an urban miracle, what Jane Jacobs got wrong, e-bike lanes, Tokyo's bike-free transit model, the placelessness of global coffee shops, why the iPhone looks boring now, the ugliest country he's visited, his love for Australia's polymer notes, his soft spot for the dollar's "locked in amber" weirdness, underground power lines, how to warn future civilizations about nuclear waste, why highway signs lie to you about speed limits, the principles of a great city flag, the Pocatello redesign saga, his own studio, why 99% Invisible works precisely because it's audio-only, the most unusual habit behind his long productive career, and more.
Read a transcript enhanced with helpful links, or watch the full video on YouTube.
Recorded August 28th, 2026.
Other ways to connect
Follow us on X and Instagram
Follow Tyler on X
Follow Roman on X
Sign up for our newsletter
Join our Discord
Email us: cowenconvos@mercatus.gmu.edu 
Learn more about Conversations with Tyler and other Mercatus Center podcasts here.
Timestamps:
00:00:00 - Intro
00:01:08 - On urban and suburban design
00:21:55 - On phone design
00:24:36 - On the world's ugliest places
00:26:03 - On currency design
00:28:33 - On power lines, speed bumps, and nuclear warning signs
00:34:31 - On city flags
00:40:39 - On building 99% Invisible
00:45:06 - Outro

Liaquat Ahamed has spent years making central bankers into compelling characters. His 2009 book Lords of Finance won the Pulitzer Prize for its account of the bankers whose decisions helped cause the Great Depression; his new book, 1873: The Rothschilds, the First Great Depression, and the Making of the Modern World, tells a stranger story — a severe deflationary crisis that barely dented global growth but poisoned politics for a generation. Tyler pushes him hard on the central puzzle of those two books — why did one financial crisis derail the world, while another left growth almost untouched?
Tyler and Liaquat start with that puzzle before moving through Gladstone's startlingly self-interested bet on Egyptian bonds, Bismarck's role in destroying bimetallism and deflating the world economy for two decades, whether a global silver or symmetallic standard could have worked, Britain's fateful decision to re-peg the pound to gold in 1926, Hjalmar Schacht's transformation from the economist who stabilized Weimar's currency to opportunist collaborator with the Nazi regime, Montagu Norman's spiritualist beliefs, why the 1920s produced such a creative cultural moment, lessons from the IMF on Ireland's housing bubble and Pakistan's two dozen bailouts, what went wrong in the eurozone crisis, Britain's baffling modern stagnation, and finally to his own restless career and what he wants to write next.
Read a transcript enhanced with helpful links, or watch the full video on YouTube.
Recorded July 28th, 2026.
Other ways to connect
Follow us on X and Instagram
Follow Tyler on X
Sign up for our newsletter
Join our Discord
Email us: cowenconvos@mercatus.gmu.edu 
Learn more about Conversations with Tyler and other Mercatus Center podcasts here.
Timestamps:
00:00:00 - Intro
00:01:13 - On 1873 vs. the Great Depression
00:15:32 - On bimetallism and the gold standard
00:21:32 - On the 1920s and Weimar hyperinflation
00:29:29 - On Ireland, Pakistan, and the Eurozone crisis
00:36:21 - On Liaquat's career and Ismaili Islam
00:44:37 - Outro

Luis Garicano has one of the more unusual résumés in economics: trained at the University of Chicago Booth School under Gary Becker, Kevin Murphy, and Sherwin Rosen, he left academia for a stint as a member of the European Parliament before returning to research, now at the London School of Economics for a second time. His new book, Messy Jobs, co-authored with Jin Li and Yanhui Wu, argues that AI won't cause mass unemployment for a surprising reason: it will make jobs messier, not simpler, and messiness is precisely what AI struggles with.
Tyler and Luis start their conversation with Spain — housing, NIMBYism, and the productivity crisis; Spanish literature and why the Civil War still looms so large; and what Chicago taught Luis about party discipline in European politics. Then to the EU's unanimity problem, capital markets, and Denmark's flexicurity model; a round of overrated-versus-underrated on Rosalía, Penélope Cruz, and Sgt. Pepper's; and finally into Messy Jobs — why retraining programs fail, whether AI's leisure dividend has arrived, and whether Spain could ever achieve AI sovereignty.
Read a transcript enhanced with helpful links, or watch the full video on YouTube.
Recorded July 28th, 2026.
Other ways to connect
Follow us on X and Instagram
Follow Tyler on X
Follow Luis on X
Sign up for our newsletter
Join our Discord
Email us: cowenconvos@mercatus.gmu.edu 
Learn more about Conversations with Tyler and other Mercatus Center podcasts here.
Timestamps:
00:00:00 - Intro
00:01:05 - On Spain's housing and political paralysis
00:11:08 - On Spanish literature and the Civil War
00:16:52 - On Basque and Catalan public finance
00:18:59 - On party discipline and political selection
00:22:03 - On the EU's unanimity problem
00:28:47 - On flexicurity and European labor rigidity
00:30:24 - Overrated vs. underrated
00:33:12 - On the future of Spanish language
00:35:01 - On why AI won't cause mass unemployment
00:48:38 - On what's next
00:50:11 - Outro