True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

When federal investigators found illegal images on a hard drive connected to Keith Raniere, every person charged alongside him moved for a plea deal. He went to trial alone — and lost on every count.
For twenty years, NXIVM presented itself as a personal development organization headquartered outside Albany, New York. Executive Success Programs offered multi-day intensives that cost thousands of dollars. A colored-sash hierarchy tracked members’ ranks. Recruitment drove advancement. The Bronfman heiresses reportedly invested over $100 million. At its peak the organization counted approximately 700 active members, including a prominent television actress who served as a key recruiter.
What prosecutors revealed at trial was a criminal enterprise. A secret inner circle called DOS operated a master-slave hierarchy. Women were branded with Raniere’s initials, controlled through compromising collateral, placed on extreme diets, and allegedly coerced. Seven federal counts were brought against Raniere, from racketeering to forced labor conspiracy to trafficking. The fraud charge alone included eleven racketeering acts.
In June 2019, the jury returned guilty verdicts on all seven counts. Raniere was sentenced to 120 years in federal prison. The organization was dissolved in 2021. Its campus was seized and sold in 2025 for $700,000 — less than what some members paid in course fees over a lifetime.
This is part one of a four-part Hidden Killers series on NXIVM and Keith Raniere.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#NXIVM #KeithRaniere #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #CultExposed #NXIVMCU

The Nancy Guthrie investigation has a piece of evidence that, by itself, could end this case. Unknown contributor DNA recovered from inside Nancy's home. The question is whether it gets to a name — and how.
Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins Tony Brueski to map exactly that. With 28 years of FBI experience including organized crime and complex investigations, Jennifer knows the realistic paths from a single DNA sample to an arrest. She walks Tony through them in order: a CODIS hit, an investigative genealogy build-out, a cross-reference with persons of interest, an unexpected lead from another evidence stream that narrows the pool.
She also addresses what's been a quiet source of controversy in this case — the decision to route the DNA evidence through multiple federal and state labs instead of sending it straight to Quantico. That choice can either speed things up or create the exact bottleneck that's frustrating everyone watching this case. Jennifer says which side of that line she thinks the current routing falls on.
Beyond the DNA, she takes on the other half of the evidence picture: the thousands of hours of surveillance video already in investigators' hands. She explains how the digital footprint — vehicle movement, cellphone activity, the white truck and red sedan reported near the property — could narrow to a suspect before the DNA results come in.
Throughout the conversation, Jennifer keeps coming back to one question. When Sheriff Chris Nanos says the case is "getting closer," is that backed by something real? She gives an honest answer. She also lays out the specific public signals that would indicate a major break is finally days or weeks away — not months.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ 
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod 
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#NancyGuthrie #DNAEvidence #ForensicGenealogy #CODIS #FBI #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrueCrimeToday #TucsonMissing #PimaCountySheriff #SavannahGuthrie

When the lead sheriff in a high-profile case stops talking to the victim's family more than 100 days in, something has shifted. In the Nancy Guthrie investigation, that shift just got confirmed on the record.
Sheriff Chris Nanos told People magazine he is no longer personally communicating with Nancy's family. Savannah Guthrie and her siblings are now reached only through the FBI. He framed the change as something that "works both ways." Whether anyone in the family agrees with that characterization is a different question entirely.
Tony Brueski brings in retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer to read what this actually means. With 28 years of Bureau experience across SWAT, organized crime, and complex investigations, Jennifer knows what these handoffs typically look like. Some are routine. Some are protective. Some signal that something deeper has fractured.
She breaks down which category this one belongs to. She talks about what kind of family-investigator dynamic was operating in the early weeks of the case, what changed, and what indicators in Sheriff Nanos's public conduct line up with that change. She also tackles the awkward question of who initiated the cut-off — and why neither side seems eager to say.
The Guthrie family is still offering a $1 million reward. They've been publicly cleared. They are doing the painful, public-facing work of trying to bring Nancy home. Losing direct access to the official running the investigation isn't a small administrative update. It's a meaningful signal about where the case actually stands.
Jennifer reads that signal honestly. She also addresses what should give the family — and the public — actual hope at this stage, and what shouldn't.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ 
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod 
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #FBI #ChrisNanos #PimaCountySheriff #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrueCrimeToday #TucsonMissing #MissingPersons #JusticeForNancy

The South Carolina Supreme Court unanimously reversed Alex Murdaugh's murder convictions on the grounds that former Colleton County Clerk Becky Hill corrupted the jury process. The guilty verdicts have been vacated. The life sentences have been set aside. The legal record reflects that no individual stands convicted of the murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh.
The constitutional framework is clear. The State charged Murdaugh with double murder. The Supreme Court determined the trial was unfair. The State's obligation to prosecute has not been extinguished — it has been reset. If the evidence is sufficient to secure a conviction under fair conditions, a second jury will deliver a verdict that withstands appellate scrutiny. If it is not, the public and the victims' families are entitled to that determination.
Five days after the reversal, Murdaugh's defense team filed a Section 1983 federal civil rights complaint against Hill. The seventeen-page filing seeks six hundred thousand dollars in damages — directed entirely to the receivership — and is structured to access civil discovery mechanisms: depositions, document subpoenas, and sworn testimony. Defense counsel Jim Griffin stated publicly that the purpose is investigative, not financial.
Eric Faddis examines the legal requirements of the Section 1983 claim — the elements Murdaugh's team must establish, the unusual posture of targeting a court clerk rather than law enforcement, and the strategic value of civil discovery running parallel to criminal retrial preparation. He addresses the state prosecutor's prior determination that insufficient evidence existed to charge Hill with jury tampering — a conclusion reached four months before the Supreme Court found her conduct warranted reversal.
The Attorney General has reportedly indicated the death penalty is under consideration. Individuals personally harmed by Murdaugh's financial crimes have expressed willingness to testify again. Murdaugh is serving 40 years on federal financial crimes convictions and will not be released regardless of the retrial's outcome. The retrial's purpose is accountability for the deaths of two people — not the adjustment of a sentence already being served.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #BeckyHill #Section1983 #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh #SCSupremeCourt #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime

Kouri Richins is serving life without parole following a jury conviction that required less than three hours of deliberation. The defense called no witnesses at trial. The sentencing judge characterized her as "simply too dangerous to ever be free." Her defense team has requested additional time to file a motion for a new trial and indicated the need to retain an expert.
The available appellate avenues are identifiable and limited. Defense attorney and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis examines each: the alleged prosecutorial monitoring of attorney-client jail communications — the most constitutionally significant issue if substantiated; the Crozier recantation — which requires demonstrating the testimony would have altered the verdict, a high evidentiary bar; the venue challenge; and a sufficiency-of-the-evidence argument that faces the reality of a jury that found the circumstantial case overwhelming despite no direct evidence presentation by the defense.
The post-conviction conduct documented in the record raises separate concerns. Prior to sentencing, a message attributed to the defendant was included in the prosecution's filing: "expose this county, the prosecution, the judge, the Richins, the investigation." She reportedly wrote, "They picked the wrong one" and "They haven't seen anything yet." She allegedly authored correspondence from jail instructing a family member to provide false testimony. She is accused of witness intimidation. Her thirteen-year-old son told the court he fears she would come for him upon any future release.
Faddis addresses the mechanisms available to a convicted person serving life — mail, telephone access, proxy actors, and individuals outside the facility who accept her claims of innocence. He examines the legal instruments designed to prevent continued contact and intimidation: no-contact orders, protective orders, and corrections-level communication restrictions. Each addresses a different vector of potential harm, and Faddis identifies the gaps that remain even when all are implemented simultaneously.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#KouriRichins #EricRichins #LifeWithoutParole #WitnessIntimidation #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #ParkCityUtah #AppellateLaw #JusticeForEric