True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

Patrick Clancy came home with dinner on January 24th, 2023. His wife was injured in the backyard. His three children were in the basement. Cora was five. Dawson was three. Callan was eight months old. Within 72 hours, all three were gone.
Lindsay Clancy — a devoted mother and labor and delivery nurse at Massachusetts General Hospital — allegedly strangled all three children with exercise bands before attempting to take her own life by jumping from a second-story window. She survived. She is now paralyzed from the chest down, held at Tewksbury State Hospital, awaiting a trial currently scheduled for July 2026.
She has pleaded not guilty. Prosecutors allege premeditation — that she calculated Patrick's absence, sent him on a deliberate errand, and created the window intentionally. Her defense maintains she was in active psychosis at the time, hearing a commanding voice she could not resist, the result of a serious illness the medical system allegedly failed to diagnose or treat.
In the days after the deaths, Patrick released a public statement of forgiveness that divided the country. The debate it sparked has never stopped.
Part 1 of our five-part deep-dive into the Lindsay Clancy case, presented in partnership with Hidden Killers, establishes the foundation: who was lost, who Lindsay was, and what it looks like when two opposing accounts of the same devastating night collide for the first time.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#LindsayClancy #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #PostpartumPsychosis #DuxburyMassachusetts #PatrickClancy #MurderCase #MaternalMentalHealth #TrueCrimePodcast #CriminalJustice

The legal pressure surrounding Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos reached a significant threshold this week, with direct implications for the ongoing investigation into the disappearance of Nancy Guthrie. The Pima County Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to invoke state law compelling Nanos to provide sworn reports regarding his department — with non-compliance creating a legal pathway to his removal from office.
The action follows a 241-0 no-confidence vote by the Pima County Deputies Organization, citing records from Nanos' tenure with the El Paso Police Department. According to reporting by the Arizona Republic and AZPM, those documents describe approximately 26 disciplinary allegations over six years — including excessive force, discharge of a firearm, insubordination, illegal gambling, and threatening behavior — before Nanos resigned in 1982 in lieu of termination. His deputies contend those records were never disclosed to Pima County.
Of particular legal significance: reporting by the Arizona Republic and AZPM indicated that in a December 2025 deposition, Nanos was asked under oath whether he had ever been suspended and reportedly testified that he had not — a statement that appears inconsistent with the documented record. Pima County Supervisor Matt Heinz has described Nanos' 42-year career as potentially "based on fraud."
Against this backdrop, questions persist about critical investigative decisions in the Guthrie case: the early release of the crime scene, the routing of DNA evidence to a private Florida lab rather than through federal channels, and reported early friction with FBI evidence access. Federal prosecutors have publicly affirmed their continued involvement regardless of what occurs at the sheriff's office level.
Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer provides legal and procedural analysis on the sworn testimony questions, the investigative implications of the Nanos crisis, and what a potential leadership transition means for the integrity of this case.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#NancyGuthrie #SheriffNanos #PimaCounty #TrueCrimeToday #JenniferCoffindaffer #HiddenKillers #FBIInvestigation #SwornTestimony #MissingPerson #BringNancyHome

The investigative picture in the Nancy Guthrie disappearance grew significantly more complex this week following Savannah Guthrie's first public interview since her mother was reported missing from her Tucson-area home. Key details confirmed: the suspect made two separate visits to the residence prior to the night of the alleged abduction. Investigators are actively pursuing the theory that the armed individual visible on doorbell camera footage was functioning as a lookout — and that at least one additional person may have been present inside the home at the time.
Nancy Guthrie, 84, was living with significant physical limitations and could not have been moved without assistance. She was taken without shoes or medication. The logistics of the alleged abduction point to a coordinated operation built on prior surveillance of the victim — her address, her living situation, her physical condition.
FBI canvassing activity has moved from broad neighborhood sweeps to targeted questioning about specific categories of people: former residents who recently relocated, and construction workers active at a nearby property. That level of focus in a canvassing operation reflects a working theory, not a search for leads.
Savannah also addressed the family's public responses to potential ransom communications — including video statements directed at possible abductors — and stated her belief that certain ransom notes may be legitimate while others likely are not. The investigative and legal implications of a family publicly engaging with potential ransom demands, including the effect on negotiation posture and evidentiary value, are examined directly in this episode.
Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer provides procedural analysis on the surveillance profile, the ransom communication dynamics, and the significance of the continued absence of any confirmed proof of life.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #MissingPerson #TrueCrimeToday #JenniferCoffindaffer #HiddenKillers #PimaCounty #FBIInvestigation #KidnappingInvestigation #BringNancyHome

The Kelsey Fitzsimmons bench trial has concluded its evidentiary phase. Both sides have rested. Closing arguments are pending, with a verdict potentially to follow the same day. A single judge will determine whether the single count — assault with a dangerous weapon — is supported beyond a reasonable doubt.
The central factual dispute: the prosecution contends that Fitzsimmons, a former North Andover police officer, raised her service weapon and directed it at Officer Patrick Noonan's face, pulled the trigger on an unchambered round, and racked the slide before Noonan discharged his weapon. The defense contends the weapon was raised to Fitzsimmons's own temple throughout — that this was a mental health crisis and suicide attempt, not an assault — and that Fitzsimmons was shot while in crisis, not while threatening another officer.
Fitzsimmons testified in her own defense on day three, providing her account of the sequence directly. Her testimony included statements made in the ambulance following the shooting. A neighbor of Noonan's also testified on day three. Fitzsimmons's mother testified that she was present in the home, heard two shots, and did not hear her daughter speak. A defense-requested site visit, litigated over two days, was cancelled without explanation following Fitzsimmons's testimony.
Of legal significance: the grand jury declined to indict on armed assault with intent to murder prior to trial — the top charge the prosecution originally pursued. The case proceeded on the lesser assault count. Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta examines what that pre-trial grand jury outcome signals about the evidentiary posture, the strategic calculus behind the bench trial election, and the legal architecture of a mental health defense that incorporates postpartum depression, prior on-duty trauma, and post-incident clinical findings without becoming a prosecution narrative. Retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke addresses the evidentiary weight of behavioral testimony and what officer statements on scene — including the words spoken immediately before the shot was fired — communicate about real-time perception under stress. Martha Coakley, former Massachusetts Attorney General, leads the defense.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#KelseyFitzsimmons #NorthAndoverPolice #BenchTrial #TrueCrimeToday #HiddenKillers #BobMotta #RobinDreeke #MarthaCoakley #MentalHealthCrisis #MassachusettsTrial

The legal and institutional framework surrounding Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos now involves three simultaneous tracks: a 241-0 no-confidence vote from the deputies' union, a unanimous Board of Supervisors invocation of a territorial statute requiring sworn statements under threat of removal, and an active recall campaign. Supervisor Matt Heinz publicly characterized Nanos's 42-year Pima County tenure as "fruit of a poison tree" and stated that Nanos's answer in a December 2025 deposition is "disqualifying for any county employee, but especially one in law enforcement."
The critical procedural development: Nanos has stated he will comply with the board's order. The statute invoked ties its removal mechanism to non-compliance — refusal to submit sworn statements — not to the adequacy or content of those statements. Whether compliance, even if the board finds the substance deficient, provides a legal basis for removal under this specific statute is a question county attorneys are currently working to resolve. The board's next scheduled meeting is April 7, at which point outside counsel is expected to present draft language and the board will determine next steps.
This episode provides a full procedural breakdown of the statute's scope, the December deposition at issue and its legal implications, the recall campaign's procedural threshold and timeline, and what each possible outcome means for the active kidnapping investigation.
Former FBI Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program Chief Robin Dreeke then addresses listener questions on the operational and behavioral dimensions: what command-level instability does to active investigators, what the sustained pattern of Nanos's public communications signals from a behavioral analysis standpoint, and how the FBI's involvement functions — or is complicated — under conditions of jurisdictional friction at the sheriff level.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#NancyGuthrie #ChrisNanos #SavannahGuthrie #TrueCrimeToday #MissingPersons #HiddenKillers #PimaCounty #FBI #BringNancyHome #RobinDreeke