True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

Patrick Clancy has never been charged with anything in his children's deaths. That hasn't stopped the internet from trying him anyway — twice, from two different directions. Retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke and psychotherapist Shavaun Scott join Tony Brueski to break down the online case against a man neither prosecutors nor Lindsay's own defense team has ever pointed at. On TikTok, testimony about a blood stain on a windowsill turned into a fully staged theory by the same night: Patrick pushing Lindsay out the window. New photos of his second wife got lined up next to old photos of Lindsay — same hair, same build — and a wedding three years after the deaths became proof of a plan. On a separate front, the case has split almost entirely by gender. Men on X want Lindsay punished as severely as possible and ignore the psychosis defense outright. Women online have gone the other way, branding Patrick a narcissist and repeatedly invoking Chris Watts by name. Patrick told the jury directly he wasn't married to a monster. Dreeke and Scott walk through how a medical symptom Lindsay described got reread online as evidence against her husband, why his remarriage reads as guilt to two completely different audiences, and what it does to a grieving father to be convicted by an internet that was never in the courtroom and never heard the evidence. 
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ 
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod 
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod 
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. 
#PatrickClancy #LindsayClancy #TrueCrimeToday #RobinDreeke #ShavaunScott #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrime #ConspiracyTheory #GenderWar #Duxbury

Luigi Mangione confessed to killing Brian Thompson. In the same breath, he pleaded guilty to stalking — not murder. No deal was cut to get there. He simply admitted, on the record, that he stalked the UnitedHealthcare CEO to an investor conference, posed as an investor controlling tens of billions of dollars to learn exactly where Thompson would be, 3D-printed the gun he used, and traveled to New York with the intent to kill. He told the judge he understood it was illegal. He showed no remorse. He never referred to Thompson as a husband or a father — only as a target. Thompson's wife, Paulette, sat in the front row and cried while he described it. Hours later, his defense team filed to dismiss the separate state murder case on double jeopardy grounds, with that trial's jury selection already scheduled for September 8. Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins Tony Brueski to break down what it means when a confessed killer is convicted of the lesser charge, and what his legal team is trying to pull off next. This is a man who has now beaten a terrorism charge and beaten the federal death penalty — and may be about to beat a state murder trial too. Federal sentencing is set for December 18. Guidelines call for twenty-four to thirty years; prosecutors say they want life. Mangione is twenty-eight. The episode lays out the confession, the legal strategy, and the gap between what he admitted and what he's actually been convicted of. 
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ 
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod 
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod 
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. 
#LuigiMangione #BrianThompson #TrueCrimeToday #JenniferCoffindaffer #GuiltyPlea #DoubleJeopardy #TrueCrime #UnitedHealthcare #FederalCourt #CriminalJustice

Something happened in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial that's harder to process than the crime itself. Jurors cried as the medical examiner walked through injuries consistent with asphyxia in two of Clancy's three children. Clancy broke down sobbing at the defense table. The judge called multiple recesses. Her defense attorney, who spent three brutal hours cross-examining her psychiatrist days before, didn't ask the medical examiner a single follow-up.
But it's what her husband said that's dominating conversation around this trial. Patrick Clancy took the stand and described the final morning his three children were alive — and his choice of words has people arguing.
Clancy has pleaded not guilty to first-degree murder in the deaths of Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months, at the family's Duxbury home. Her defense is built on undiagnosed postpartum psychosis, supported by a medication history that reads like a system failure: thirteen psychiatric prescriptions across five prescribers in four months, none of them coordinating care, a hospital that allegedly declined to treat her, a nurse practitioner who called her symptoms "quite common." Journal entries entered into the trial record document her unraveling in her own words, days before everything changed.
Bob Motta watched all of it unfold ten feet from Clancy. This episode covers the testimony, the paper trail the medical system left behind, and the one line from her husband that's proving impossible to square with everything else in this case.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #BobMotta #PostpartumPsychosis #DuxburyMA #MurderTrial #KevinReddington

Mario Fernandez's defense can show exactly where he was on January 29, 2022: at his own rental property on Potomac Avenue in Jacksonville, meeting contractors, hauling construction materials, on camera. In the Jared Bridegan murder trial's fourth day of testimony, prosecutors used that same day against him. FBI Agent Bobby Blythe traced Henry Tenon's phone leaving that exact property and running a route through Bridegan's life — his neighborhood, his children's gymnastics facility, Jacksonville Beach — eighteen days before Bridegan was shot dead beside a tire left in the road. The state calls it a practice run launched from the defendant's own address. The defense calls it a workday.
The rest of the day belonged to what investigators don't have. No DNA, fingerprints, or surveillance connect Fernandez to the blue Ford F-150. No physical evidence shows John Biggerstaff supplying him a 10mm, and records showed six 10mm purchases at a single Jacksonville gun store. Nobody ever searched the property where the truck was found — an omission detectives explained with 2023 information, disputed by the defense, that the weapon was destroyed shortly after the shooting.
Fernandez is charged with first-degree murder and solicitation as the alleged hirer, and the state's proof runs through a lease, a route, and $10,000 in checks to Tenon written in the six weeks after the murder. Jurors heard Fernandez's recorded calls from the days around Tenon's arrest and his 2022 police interview calling Bridegan "a keyboard warrior more than anything." Tony Brueski breaks down which side actually won Day 4 — and why the answer depends on which job the jury thinks is on trial. Testimony runs through August 28.
Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#JaredBridegan #MarioFernandez #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast #HenryTenon #ShannaGardner #JacksonvilleBeach #MurderForHire #FernandezVerdictWatch

In Mississippi, a joint forensic examination of Nolan Wells’ phone was agreed to and then torpedoed by a 48-hour ultimatum from the DA. The phone has been in civilian hands for six weeks. Both Snapchat accounts were empty when the family opened them. The state autopsy is sealed. A grand jury is waiting.
In Massachusetts, the prosecution rested its case against Lindsay Clancy after fourteen days and seventy witnesses. Their own witnesses called her a wonderful mother. Their own psychiatrist never met her in person. They asked about mortal sin. They called her injuries faked. The defense psychologist has met with Lindsay sixty times and diagnosed her with postpartum psychosis. The prosecution floated a theory he coached her. The investigator acknowledged no evidence supported it.
Eric Faddis, defense attorney and former prosecutor, examines the prosecution’s decisions in both cases and evaluates whether they can still win what they may have already given away.
Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#NolanWells #LindsayClancy #TrueCrimeToday #EricFaddis #ProsecutionBlunders #PostpartumPsychosis #HornIsland #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #TrueCrime #InsanityDefense