True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

The Alex Murdaugh murder retrial is scheduled for April 2027. Before a new jury ever hears the case, his defense wants a South Carolina judge to throw out the existing indictments over two claims made to the grand jury: blood spatter on his shirt and shotgun ammunition at the family property.
The white shirt is central. SLED investigator David Owen told grand jurors that an expert had identified Maggie and Paul Murdaugh's blood spatter on it. But a 2021 laboratory report found no human blood in tested shirt samples. During the original trial, Owen agreed that the grand-jury version was incorrect. He testified that he did not receive or see that report before giving his sworn statement and said his intention was not to deceive.
The second issue comes from an interview in which Owen gave Murdaugh information about shotguns and ammunition. Owen later called that questioning tactic trickery. The defense argues an inaccurate claim of that sort cannot simply be reused under oath. It says the combined problems justify dismissing four indictments without prejudice, leaving the state free to present a properly supported case to another grand jury.
The prosecution rejects the accusation that evidence was fabricated. In a response filed November 9, it argued that further tests and a consulting expert supported a different interpretation of the garment, and that the initial lab report had been missed. Prosecutors also maintain the grand jury was presented with a broader body of evidence, not just the challenged assertions. Judge Debra McCaslin has yet to decide.
Tony Brueski and defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis examine whether the remedy fits the alleged misconduct, why the difference between a suspect interview and sworn testimony matters, and what a November 13 hearing might change. Murdaugh continues to deny the murders. No finding of intentional fabrication is established by the pending motion.
Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughMurders #HiddenKillers #SLED #DavidOwen #MurdaughRetrial #GrandJury #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh #EricFaddis

A federal jury has been asked to decide what happened inside Sandra Birchmore’s apartment during Matthew Farwell’s final recorded visit. Prosecutors say surveillance puts him entering at 9:14 p.m. and leaving at 9:43 on February 1, 2021. Two state witnesses testified that Sandra’s iPhone stopped registering steps at 9:40. The defense disputes the leap from those timestamps to a murder conclusion.
Tony Brueski is joined by defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis and retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer. Their perspectives are different by design. Faddis considers the evidence the way a defense lawyer might challenge it; Coffindaffer considers how investigators construct a timeline from digital records, physical findings, and witness testimony.
Sandra was pregnant when she died. Prosecutors described a text that evening asking Farwell to buy the outfit the baby would wear home, followed later by an invitation saying the door was open. They say Farwell killed her to stop exposure of crimes related to a relationship that began when she was a minor in the Stoughton Police Explorers program. Farwell denies killing her and has pleaded not guilty.
The defense called Dr. Thomas Andrew, a former New Hampshire chief medical examiner, who challenged the interpretation of Sandra’s injuries and said a partial hanging could account for key findings. Other experts disagreed. Prosecutors also emphasized evidence they attributed to Farwell on the strap connected to the doorknob; the defense challenged the meaning and weight of the forensic record.
On November 6 the trial moved to jury deliberations. On November 9 jurors said they were deadlocked, and Judge Denise Casper told them to resume. The prosecution must prove the federal offense, including the alleged purpose of preventing a report of criminal wrongdoing. It is not enough for one side to tell a better story. The evidence must carry the burden.
Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#SandraBirchmore #MatthewFarwell #HiddenKillers #FarwellTrial #StoughtonPolice #EricFaddis #JenniferCoffindaffer #FederalTrial #JusticeForSandra #TrueCrime

When Nancy Guthrie disappeared from her home near Tucson in February 2026, the physical evidence was small but urgent: blood at the front porch and images of a masked person near the door. Later reporting raised concerns about whether the scene was protected quickly enough. Now a private analyst’s claim about January phone activity raises a second question: how far back should investigators be looking?
Tony Brueski talks with retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer and retired FBI behavioral chief Robin Dreeke about both strands. The private analyst reportedly identified devices that appeared near the neighborhood before Nancy vanished. Those reports do not establish who owned the devices, what they were doing or whether the information has been authenticated by law enforcement. It takes supporting location records and investigative corroboration to turn a pattern into a lead.
According to The Wall Street Journal, first responders did not fully secure the porch for an extended period, creating potential concerns about contamination or lost traces. Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos disputes aspects of that account and says the case remains active. He has acknowledged that the house was released earlier than ideal. Reuters separately reported friction over laboratory testing, including the use of a Florida private lab instead of sending certain evidence immediately to the FBI at Quantico. The sheriff defended the decision.
Coffindaffer addresses investigative standards and the practical difficulty of reconstructing who was near a house after months have passed. Dreeke evaluates what the video does and does not say about an unknown person’s planning or intentions. Neither a theory about preparation nor a theory about a ransom proves what happened to Nancy.
Her family is still looking for answers. The difference between a missed opportunity and a provable investigative failure deserves care. What matters now is preserving what remains, following defensible leads and refusing to convert uncertainty into a verdict on anyone involved.
Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #HiddenKillers #JenniferCoffindaffer #RobinDreeke #Tucson #PimaCounty #MissingPerson #FBI #TrueCrime

Jensen Huang already had money, power and people telling him how great he is when, reports say, he got involved with Alice Huang, a former Megaspeed executive U.S. intelligence reportedly concluded was a Chinese intelligence asset. The Nvidia CEO has since told employees he was unfaithful to his wife, and I ask retired FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke why a man with everything would need more.
Robin is the former chief of the FBI's Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program. Nvidia says its cloud customers in Asia get ordinary business information, not company secrets, and its board says it has no reason to believe national security was compromised. One report says an intelligence memo described her assignment as including pushing Huang to argue for looser export rules on chips.
Robin and I go through how you'd find out if it was spying, whether the FBI would ask someone being used to keep talking to the suspected spy, and how a secret becomes a threat. We close with separate cases that turned deadly: the at least ten CIA and FBI sources executed after Aldrich Ames handed information to the KGB, and the Justice Department's case that Iran's government directed a plot to murder journalist Masih Alinejad.
China calls the reports groundless, and Alice Huang hasn't commented.
Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#NvidiaSpyScandal #JensenHuang #TrueCrimeToday #AliceHuang #AldrichAmes #MasihAlinejad #RobinDreeke #Espionage #TrueCrime #TonyBrueski

SLED cut seventy-four pieces from the white T-shirt Alex Murdaugh wore the night Maggie and Paul were killed. Eleven months after those tests came back, the lead agent on the case told a Colleton County grand jury the shirt carried high-impact blood spatter. On the witness stand in 2023 he was asked whether that was incorrect, and said it was, in reference to the shirt. No spatter opinion ever reached the trial jury, and on August 7, 2026 the defense asked a judge to throw out all four indictments over how the indictments were obtained. Part 4 of the Murdaugh murder mystery covers the clerk of court whose book undid the first verdict, the money evidence Judge McCaslin has not yet ruled on, the move to Sumter County, and the April 5, 2027 trial date. Alex says he did not kill his wife and son.
Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#MurdaughMurders #BeckyHill #HiddenKillers #AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #MoselleMurders #TrueCrime #SumterCounty #TrueCrimeDocumentary #SouthCarolina