True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

The death of Anna Kepner aboard the Carnival Horizon on November 7, 2025, while the vessel traveled over international waters, placed the case in federal jurisdiction — the Southern District of Florida. This look back examines the procedural posture and its implications for the prosecution, the defense, and the fractured family at the center of it.
The defendant, Anna's sixteen-year-old stepbrother, was initially charged as a juvenile. On April 13, 2026, a federal grand jury returned an indictment charging him as an adult with first-degree murder and an additional serious federal charge. He has pleaded not guilty. Despite the prosecution's argument that he poses a danger and should be detained, the court ruled he may remain free pending trial on GPS monitoring with a family member. Trial is set for the fall.
The reported evidence includes security camera footage showing the defendant as the only individual entering and exiting the stateroom during the relevant window, sounds reportedly heard by Anna's younger sibling from outside the cabin, and text messages in which the defendant reportedly stated repeatedly that he could not remember what happened. The Miami-Dade Medical Examiner determined the cause of death to be mechanical asphyxiation. Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis analyzes the indictment structure, the significance of the adult-court transfer, and the competing family dynamics — including custody disputes and abuse allegations that have surfaced in parallel proceedings. We revisit where the matter stood at the time of our reporting.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#AnnaKepner #CarnivalHorizon #TimothyHudson #FederalJurisdiction #FirstDegreeMurder #EricFaddis #JusticeForAnna #TrueCrime #CruiseShipMurder #HiddenKillers

The forensic chain that ultimately produced Rex Heuermann's guilty plea began with a pizza crust recovered during surveillance — and ended with whole genome sequencing admitted in a New York courtroom for the first time. This look back, with defense attorney and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis, examines the evidentiary architecture that made the case unwinnable and the two pre-trial rulings that the defense attorney himself identified as decisive.
The prosecution held DNA linkage across multiple crime scenes, established through a technology never before admitted in the jurisdiction. It also held a deleted Word document recovered from Heuermann's hard drive, described as a planning document for the killings. More than 350 electronic devices were seized, with deleted files recovered from unallocated hard drive space. The defense challenged the DNA methodology through a Frye hearing but did not challenge the planning document. When the judge admitted the DNA and denied the motion for separate trials, the defense's path to acquittal effectively closed.
Heuermann pleaded guilty on April 8, 2026, to three counts of first-degree murder and four counts of second-degree murder, and admitted to killing an eighth woman as part of the agreement. He confirmed strangulation as the cause of death for each victim. He is expected to be sentenced to three consecutive life terms plus an additional hundred years, and has agreed to cooperate with the FBI's Behavioral Analysis Unit. Faddis analyzes the plea structure, the sentencing exposure, and the legal significance of the FBI cooperation requirement. We revisit where the matter stood at the time of our reporting.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#RexHeuermann #GilgoBeachKiller #LISK #DNAEvidence #WholeGenomeSequencing #EricFaddis #PleaDeal #GilgoBeach #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers

Celeste Rivas Hernandez, a fourteen-year-old girl who had been missing for approximately seventeen months, was found only because a vehicle received a parking citation and was subsequently towed. When tow-yard employees opened the front trunk of the impounded Tesla — registered to David Anthony Burke, the recording artist known as D4VD — they discovered her remains in a condition that made determining cause of death an extraordinary challenge.
This look back traces the investigative arc from that discovery through to the charges that were ultimately filed. The investigation involved a sealed medical examiner's report held under a court-ordered security hold initiated by LAPD, tracking data allegedly placing Burke in a remote area, evidence reportedly recovered during a search of a Hollywood Hills rental, and a grand jury proceeding that heard testimony over an extended period. Burke was arrested via a probable-cause warrant — a Ramey warrant — rather than on a grand jury indictment, meaning LAPD moved ahead of the DA's filing decision.
Charges were subsequently filed, including first-degree murder and additional counts related to the victim's age and the condition of her remains. Burke has pleaded not guilty and remains held without bail. The segment also examines the role of a key associate — a close friend of Burke's who was arrested for failing to appear before the grand jury, testified briefly, and later posted privately claiming to have information while conspicuously omitting the victim's name. We revisit where the matter stood at the time of our reporting, distinguishing court-confirmed facts from investigative reporting.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#D4VD #CelesteRivasHernandez #DavidBurke #LAPD #RameyWarrant #TrueCrime #FirstDegreeMurder #GrandJury #MurderInvestigation #HiddenKillers

The Kouri Richins prosecution faced a structural challenge that would sink many cases: no direct evidence established how the fatal dose of fentanyl was administered, and the defense built its entire strategy around that absence. The jury convicted on all counts regardless. This look back examines how a largely circumstantial case secured a conviction for first-degree aggravated murder.
Over a trial spanning roughly three weeks and more than forty prosecution witnesses, the Summit County Attorney's Office advanced a theory of financial motive and escalating intent. The state presented evidence of significant debt, a forged insurance application, and a prior attempt on the victim's life weeks before his death — the basis for a separate attempted-aggravated-murder conviction. The autopsy established fentanyl intoxication at approximately five times a lethal level. Prosecutors argued the drug was introduced through the victim's drinks, though they did not present direct evidence of the mechanism. The defense rested without calling witnesses.
We revisit where the matter stood at the time of our reporting. The segment analyzes the evidentiary standard at work — how a jury may convict beyond a reasonable doubt on an accumulation of circumstantial proof — and what this outcome suggests about motive-driven prosecutions in the absence of physical certainty. The defendant has maintained her innocence and stated her intention to appeal, and the analysis treats the conviction as the legal finding it is while noting the appellate posture.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#KouriRichins #EricRichins #FentanylMurder #UtahMurderTrial #CircumstantialEvidence #AggravatedMurder #TrueCrime #ProsecutionCase #InsuranceFraud #HiddenKillers

The not guilty plea entered on Nick Reiner's behalf is one of the most misunderstood moments in this case. Charged with two counts of first-degree murder with a multiple-murder special circumstance in the stabbing deaths of his parents, Rob and Michele Reiner, he faces a prosecution that has not ruled out seeking the ultimate penalty.
Under California procedure, a not guilty plea preserves every defense option while psychiatric evaluation continues. The defense can later pursue legal insanity under the established standard, argue diminished capacity to challenge premeditation and reduce the degree of the offense, or raise the question of competency to proceed. Each carries different evidentiary burdens and different consequences — and the defendant's documented diagnosis and recent medication change are central to all three.
This retrospective lays out where the matter stood at the time of our reporting: the procedural posture, the competing legal theories, and the analysis from those who've tried cases like it. It also examines the position of the surviving family members, who hold formal standing as next of kin while simultaneously being related to the accused — a rare and legally complex circumstance. Reporting indicates the siblings have stated their opposition to capital punishment, though prosecutors retain discretion over that decision.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#NickReiner #RobReiner #MicheleReiner #FirstDegreeMurder #SpecialCircumstances #CompetencyToStandTrial #TrueCrime #Parricide #CriminalDefense #HiddenKillers