True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

One day, Pima County's sheriff said there was no ransom note in the Nancy Guthrie case. The next day, his department released two. Tony Brueski and retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke take listener questions on that reversal and everything else this case has surfaced in the six months since Nancy was taken from her Tucson home. 
The first note opens with 'Hello Savannah,' demands four million dollars in Bitcoin, and knows details only someone inside the house would know: a white smart watch on the floor by the bed, a destroyed flood light out back. The second asks for nothing at all. It claims Nancy died shortly after she was taken, that she's buried in nature, and that the writer hopes her children find peace. Listeners want to know who abandons four million dollars, how the writer knew the inside of that house, and whether a sheriff who reversed himself overnight can be trusted with the rest of this case. 
The financial trail raises its own questions. Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer's trace shows the only money that ever moved into the alleged kidnapper's wallet came from the FBI itself, roughly three hundred dollars, and it's still sitting there untouched. No ransom was ever paid, despite Savannah Guthrie's public statement that the family did their part. Messages written directly to that wallet echo Savannah's exact on-camera words, and that line has never been answered. 
Search teams have gone back to the brush behind Nancy's own home since the monsoons. Dreeke and Coffindaffer weigh what all of it adds up to. 
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ 
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod 
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod 
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. 
#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #HiddenKillers #RansomNote #TrueCrime #Tucson #FBI #Bitcoin #MissingPerson #PimaCounty

Before Mario Fernandez's murder trial begins in the Jared Bridegan case, his defense has already reshaped the field. The alleged triggerman withdrew his confession. A judge blocked testimony about a private conversation between Fernandez and his estranged wife. Prosecutors dropped two of four charges without explanation.
But the state kept the financial records. Fernandez's property company issued three checks to the man prosecutors say shot Bridegan, totaling roughly $10,000 after the killing. One was a $5,000 payment dated April 4, 2022, allegedly carrying the words "Kickstarter" and "Good luck!" on the memo line. The defense argues these covered legitimate property maintenance and that no money went to the alleged gunman before the crime occurred.
Phone records document 35 calls between Fernandez and the alleged shooter in February 2022, the month of the killing, with 30 more the following month. A prosecutor told the court in late July that a second individual left the scene in a pickup truck and has not been publicly identified. An inmate who spent nearly a year near Fernandez in the Duval County jail told the state that Fernandez spoke openly about the conspiracy, assigned roles to the participants, and allegedly proposed a plan to shift blame onto Jared's widow Kirsten after the inmate's release.
Prosecutors say they offered the inmate no deals on his own pending case. The defense contends the state's cooperating witness was coerced into his original confession and that jailhouse informants are inherently unreliable.
Fernandez denies all charges. Trial runs August 17 through 28 in Duval County. Gardner's trial is scheduled for the end of August. Tenon goes to trial in spring 2027.

END_LINKS

Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

DISCLAIMER

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

HASHTAGS

#JaredBridegan #MarioFernandez #HiddenKillers #ShannaGardner #HenryTenon #MurderForHire #JacksonvilleBeach #DefenseStrategy #TrueCrime #DuvalCounty

The prosecution in the Lindsay Clancy trial is three weeks into presenting its case, and the ground it has lost may not be recoverable. The state's own witnesses have consistently painted a picture that helps the defense — a devoted mother, a Seroquel spiral, thirteen medications, a psychiatrist who treated her by video call and never met her face to face.
Lindsay Clancy's defense conceded she killed her children and is arguing she was in the grip of postpartum psychosis. Kevin Reddington told the jury she heard voices. He's read her journal entries about intrusive thoughts and desperation. He's dismantled the prosecution's medical witnesses on cross-examination. No clinician diagnosed psychosis before the killings.
While the trial plays out in Plymouth Superior Court, TikTok creators are accusing Patrick Clancy of being the real killer. They're comparing him to Chris Watts and scrutinizing his remarriage. Lindsay's own defense team has told the jury she did it.
Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis examines the prosecution's position, the defense's strategy, and the legal landscape for a father facing murder accusations from social media creators while his ex-wife's trial determines whether she was too sick to be held responsible for their children's deaths.
Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Nick Reiner was supposed to face a preliminary hearing this fall. Instead, the DA went to a grand jury behind closed doors and came back with an indictment that changes the case. The new charges allege lying in wait — a second special circumstance that says the killings of Rob and Michele Reiner were premeditated and concealed, not impulsive. A grand jury indictment in California replaces the original charges and eliminates the preliminary hearing entirely. The defense loses its opportunity to cross-examine prosecution witnesses before trial. The proceedings are one-sided, sealed, and operate on probable cause rather than proof beyond a reasonable doubt. The indictment was returned July 20, sat sealed for three weeks, and was unsealed August 12. Nick Reiner denied the charges in court the same morning. California's lying-in-wait special circumstance requires a jury to find that the defendant hid what he planned, waited for his opportunity, and attacked by surprise — with the specific intent to kill. Nick was diagnosed with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. He spent a year under a conservatorship for grave disability. His parents paid for his treatment, kept him on their Brentwood property, and brought him to Hollywood premieres. His medication was reportedly switched weeks before the killings. Tony explains the strategic calculation behind the grand jury move, what the prosecution just committed to proving, and what two special circumstances mean for a death penalty decision that still hasn't been made. Nick Reiner remains held on no bond. The pretrial hearing is September 15.
Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#NickReiner #RobReiner #MicheleReiner #LyingInWait #GrandJury #Indictment #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #Murder #DeathPenalty

While Lindsay Clancy stands trial for killing her three children, TikTok creators are accusing her ex-husband Patrick of being the real killer. They're comparing him to Chris Watts. They're claiming Lindsay didn't jump from the second-floor window — he pushed her. Lindsay's own defense attorney has admitted in open court that she killed the children and is arguing she was not criminally responsible.
The conspiracy theories have escalated during the trial. Creators are analyzing Patrick's remarriage to Dr. Rachel Danis, scrutinizing his courtroom demeanor, and constructing narratives that directly contradict the evidence presented before the jury. Patrick is a Microsoft employee living in New York. He testified as the prosecution's first witness and described finding his children after returning from running errands.
Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis examines the legal question at the center of the social media circus: can Patrick do anything about creators accusing him of murder to audiences of millions? Where the line between opinion and defamation falls. What it means that Patrick likely isn't a traditional public figure. Whether the Alex Jones and Sandy Hook precedent applies. And the practical challenge of filing defamation lawsuits against anonymous creators across multiple jurisdictions with no guarantee of collecting damages.
Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.