True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

Three active criminal cases. A murder trial going to the jury. A kidnapping investigation at day forty-one. A manslaughter indictment built on phone evidence and a precise legal threshold. Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer and behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke join True Crime Today for a multi-part panel covering all three with the legal and investigative precision each deserves.
The Kouri Richins segment addresses the trial's legal pressure points before deliberations begin. No murder weapon. No recovered fentanyl. A star witness under immunity whose alleged drug supplier now says he never sold fentanyl. And a detective recording that played for the jury in which investigators told that witness she needed to produce details that would "ensure Kouri gets convicted of murder." Coffindaffer breaks down the legal implications of that recording, whether the prosecution's remaining evidentiary case is strong enough to survive it, and what closing arguments must accomplish. Dreeke addresses the behavioral layer — the silence, the texts, and what the absence of testimony communicates regardless of jury instruction.
The Nancy Guthrie segment addresses a 41-day kidnapping investigation that has pivoted to digital forensics with no arrest and a public safety warning from the sheriff. Coffindaffer examines the legal and procedural dimensions of what Nanos said on national television — what the motive theory hedge means, what the public safety warning implies legally, and how the internet disruption investigative thread is built for eventual evidentiary use. Dreeke addresses the behavioral profile of premeditation and what the sustained silence around the alleged perpetrator communicates.
The Laken Snelling segment addresses a first-degree manslaughter indictment carrying up to 31 years, where the charge rests on a specific finding of conscious disregard. Coffindaffer maps the legal case — the phone evidence, the "guessed" language at the hospital, the born-alive determination — and what the prosecution must establish at trial to hold the charge. Dreeke addresses the behavioral underpinning and the jury challenge it creates.
Three cases, examined with the legal clarity they require.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#KouriRichins #NancyGuthrie #LakenSnelling #JenniferCoffindaffer #RobinDreeke #TrueCrimeToday #CriminalLaw #TrueCrime #FBIAnalysis #TrueCrimePodcast

He was the most charming man in the room. Everyone loved Alex Murdaugh.
That was the mask. Underneath was a man stealing millions, feeding an opioid addiction, living a double life that required constant crimes to maintain.
Part 2 of "The Name" explores covert narcissism — the kind that hides behind charm. The kind that makes you feel special while managing you completely. The kind that makes you question your own perception.
Maggie was starting to see it. Consulting divorce attorneys. Asking about the finances.
And then the boat crash happened. Mallory Beach died. The lawsuits started.
The double life was about to be exposed. And narcissists don't self-correct when they're cornered. They escalate.
Join Our Substack for AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter: https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughDoubleLife #CovertNarcissist #MaggieAndPaul #MurdaughTrial #TrueCrimeToday #MalloryBeach #MurdaughFraud #TrueCrime #NarcissistHusband

The Laken Snelling case is built on a specific legal threshold — first-degree manslaughter, conscious disregard — and the question of whether the evidence as it currently exists can sustain that charge through trial. That is the central legal question this episode addresses.
Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer joins True Crime Today alongside Robin Dreeke for a precise legal and procedural analysis of the Snelling case — the indictment, the evidence record, and the prosecution's path forward.
The grand jury heard all four levels of criminal homicide. They landed on manslaughter. That choice — conscious disregard over negligence — is a meaningful legal finding, and Coffindaffer examines what the prosecution had to show the grand jury to get there, and what they will need to demonstrate at trial to hold it. She works through each major piece of evidence: the phone documentation, the deleted labor photos, the pregnancy tracking, the months of documented concealment, and how each element translates into legal weight under the conscious disregard standard.
The single word "guessed" — used by Snelling when hospital staff asked whether her son was alive — is analyzed in specific legal terms. Coffindaffer addresses how hedged language of that nature is used when the medical examiner has already placed "born alive" in the record, and what it means for the prosecution's intent narrative.
The roommate element is examined procedurally: whether their 4 a.m. acceptance of "I fainted" and return to bed constitutes something investigators had to formally account for, and whether it surfaces at trial.
Dreeke adds the behavioral framework that the prosecution will need to explain to a jury — particularly around why the documented concealment pattern reflects calculated awareness rather than psychological crisis, and why that distinction matters under the law.
Up to 31 years. The charge is serious. The evidence is substantial. The legal path is specific. This is the breakdown that case deserves.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#LakenSnelling #TrueCrimeToday #NeonaticideKentucky #FirstDegreeManslaughter #LexingtonKentucky #JenniferCoffindaffer #RobinDreeke #TrueCrime #CriminalLaw #KentuckyTrueCrime

He wasn't supposed to say anything. For months, Neo Langston stayed quiet — no comments, no posts, nothing. Then on March 13th he opened Instagram Close Friends and let it out. Receipts. Rage. A pointed insult aimed at his former best friend. And screenshots that went everywhere by morning.
True Crime Today has the full breakdown.
Tony Brueski walks through what Neo actually said, what he carefully avoided saying, and why the gap between those two things matters enormously in an investigation where a 14-year-old girl's family is still waiting for answers.
Neo Langston was arrested in Montana in January by seven officers on a California warrant for failing to appear before a grand jury. He appeared in February — for 40 minutes — while D4VD's manager reportedly testified for several days. His lawyer called him fully cooperative. His private Instagram told a very different story six weeks later.
Statement analysis expert Jack Fox reviewed Neo's posts for Los Angeles Magazine and found a pattern of deliberate vagueness — designed to avoid naming the crime, the victim, or D4VD himself. Jack Fox's conclusion: Neo's prime concern was himself. PI Steve Fischer called it even more directly: if you have a side of the story, you were part of the story.
D4VD has said nothing. His family is still fighting grand jury subpoenas in Texas. No charges have been filed in the death of Celeste Rivas Hernandez. The cause of death remains officially undetermined.
The receipts exist. The question is what's being done with them.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#D4VD #CelesteRivasHernandez #NeoLangston #TrueCrime #GrandJury #TrueCrimeToday #TeslaTrunk #DavidBurke #NeoTheAsian #MurderInvestigation

A Utah jury has convicted Kouri Richins of murdering her husband Eric Richins with a lethal fentanyl cocktail — and the case is more disturbing than most headlines captured.
The night before Eric died, a text message entered into evidence showed Kouri's boyfriend had already lost hours of consciousness after eating something she gave him. The next morning, Eric was dead from five times the lethal dose of fentanyl in a Moscow Mule she made him.
True Crime Today's coverage of the Kouri Richins verdict goes deeper than the verdict itself — breaking down the full timeline of evidence prosecutors used to convince eight jurors in just three hours. The $4.5 million in debt. The secret life insurance policies. The forged signature. The Valentine's Day poisoning attempt. The Google searches she ran after Eric died. And the children's grief book, written by a ghostwriter, that briefly made her a sympathetic public figure before her arrest.
Forty-two witnesses. Zero defense witnesses. Three hours to decide. Guilty on every count.
Sentencing: May 13th.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#KouriRichins #TrueCrimeToday #EricRichins #KouriRichinsGuilty #FentanylMurder #UtahMurder #TrueCrime #MurderTrial #GriefBookMurder #KouriRichinsVerdict