True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

The South Carolina Supreme Court unanimously reversed Alex Murdaugh's murder convictions on the grounds that former Colleton County Clerk Becky Hill corrupted the jury process. The guilty verdicts have been vacated. The life sentences have been set aside. The legal record reflects that no individual stands convicted of the murders of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh.
The constitutional framework is clear. The State charged Murdaugh with double murder. The Supreme Court determined the trial was unfair. The State's obligation to prosecute has not been extinguished — it has been reset. If the evidence is sufficient to secure a conviction under fair conditions, a second jury will deliver a verdict that withstands appellate scrutiny. If it is not, the public and the victims' families are entitled to that determination.
Five days after the reversal, Murdaugh's defense team filed a Section 1983 federal civil rights complaint against Hill. The seventeen-page filing seeks six hundred thousand dollars in damages — directed entirely to the receivership — and is structured to access civil discovery mechanisms: depositions, document subpoenas, and sworn testimony. Defense counsel Jim Griffin stated publicly that the purpose is investigative, not financial.
Eric Faddis examines the legal requirements of the Section 1983 claim — the elements Murdaugh's team must establish, the unusual posture of targeting a court clerk rather than law enforcement, and the strategic value of civil discovery running parallel to criminal retrial preparation. He addresses the state prosecutor's prior determination that insufficient evidence existed to charge Hill with jury tampering — a conclusion reached four months before the Supreme Court found her conduct warranted reversal.
The Attorney General has reportedly indicated the death penalty is under consideration. Individuals personally harmed by Murdaugh's financial crimes have expressed willingness to testify again. Murdaugh is serving 40 years on federal financial crimes convictions and will not be released regardless of the retrial's outcome. The retrial's purpose is accountability for the deaths of two people — not the adjustment of a sentence already being served.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #BeckyHill #Section1983 #MaggieMurdaugh #PaulMurdaugh #SCSupremeCourt #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime

Kouri Richins is serving life without parole following a jury conviction that required less than three hours of deliberation. The defense called no witnesses at trial. The sentencing judge characterized her as "simply too dangerous to ever be free." Her defense team has requested additional time to file a motion for a new trial and indicated the need to retain an expert.
The available appellate avenues are identifiable and limited. Defense attorney and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis examines each: the alleged prosecutorial monitoring of attorney-client jail communications — the most constitutionally significant issue if substantiated; the Crozier recantation — which requires demonstrating the testimony would have altered the verdict, a high evidentiary bar; the venue challenge; and a sufficiency-of-the-evidence argument that faces the reality of a jury that found the circumstantial case overwhelming despite no direct evidence presentation by the defense.
The post-conviction conduct documented in the record raises separate concerns. Prior to sentencing, a message attributed to the defendant was included in the prosecution's filing: "expose this county, the prosecution, the judge, the Richins, the investigation." She reportedly wrote, "They picked the wrong one" and "They haven't seen anything yet." She allegedly authored correspondence from jail instructing a family member to provide false testimony. She is accused of witness intimidation. Her thirteen-year-old son told the court he fears she would come for him upon any future release.
Faddis addresses the mechanisms available to a convicted person serving life — mail, telephone access, proxy actors, and individuals outside the facility who accept her claims of innocence. He examines the legal instruments designed to prevent continued contact and intimidation: no-contact orders, protective orders, and corrections-level communication restrictions. Each addresses a different vector of potential harm, and Faddis identifies the gaps that remain even when all are implemented simultaneously.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#KouriRichins #EricRichins #LifeWithoutParole #WitnessIntimidation #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #ParkCityUtah #AppellateLaw #JusticeForEric

Nick Reiner is being held without bail at Twin Towers Correctional Facility following his arrest in December 2025 in connection with the alleged killings of his parents, Rob and Michele Reiner, in their Brentwood home. He has pleaded not guilty. Reports now indicate he is allegedly planning a tell-all from inside the facility — one designed not to address the charges but reportedly to target his surviving family members.
According to sources cited by Globe magazine, the reported book would name names and allegedly attempt to expose what Nick characterizes as family secrets. The legal implications of such a publication are significant. Any statements made by the defendant — in any format — could potentially be used by the prosecution. A tell-all that contradicts the defense's narrative or demonstrates calculated thinking could undermine an insanity defense strategy, which multiple observers have identified as the most likely approach given Nick's documented schizoaffective disorder diagnosis.
The clinical picture complicates the legal analysis. Multiple sources describe Nick as delusional and almost childlike in custody, reportedly unable to process why he's incarcerated. Reports indicate he screams about his innocence at night. A medication change reportedly occurred approximately one month before the alleged killings. Whether the reported tell-all represents calculated retaliation or a manifestation of the underlying psychiatric condition is a question the defense will eventually have to address.
His defense attorney has withdrawn from the case. Surviving siblings Jake and Romy have reportedly severed contact. Jake Reiner published a Substack essay describing his parents as guiding lights taken from him in the most violent way possible — a document that stands in stark opposition to what Nick reportedly intends to publish.
Robin Dreeke applies FBI behavioral analysis to the question of whether someone presenting with Nick's reported symptoms could independently conceive and execute a publication strategy — or whether outside influence may be involved.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#NickReiner #RobReiner #MicheleReiner #ReinerCase #JakeReiner #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #InsanityDefense #TwinTowers #BrentwoodMurders

Richard Allen volunteered his name to law enforcement two days after the Delphi murders. He'd been on the trail. He came forward willingly. His report was misfiled, marked "cleared," and lost. For five and a half years, the investigation moved without it — and according to the defense's appellate filings, it moved in circles. Recorded interviews with suspects connected to pagan rituals were erased. A .40 caliber firearm belonging to a suspect who admitted to bloodletting practices was never seized. When officers were offered the chance to review surveillance video that would have confirmed a suspect's alibi, they walked away. Tips came in identifying this suspect and each was stamped "nothing further." The crime scene pointed in directions nobody followed. Multiple officers thought it required more than one perpetrator. The FBI's BAU could not rule out a ritualistic motive. Eyewitness Betsy Blair described Bridge Guy as a young man in his twenties with brown curly hair — not a 44-year-old with a crew cut. She gave her sketch a 10 out of 10 and never wavered. The jury at Richard Allen's trial never saw Blair's sketch. They were told to skip five years of history and convict based on what the court allowed them to hear. This episode launches a five-part series walking through the investigative failures, ignored leads, and institutional breakdowns that, in my opinion, produced a wrongful conviction. Abby and Libby deserved the truth. They still do.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#Delphi #RichardAllen #DelphiMurders #AbbyAndLibby #BridgeGuy #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #WrongfulConviction #DelphiCase #JusticeForAbbyAndLibby

Three separate grand juries received testimony in the case against David Anthony Burke, known professionally as D4VD, in connection with the alleged murder of fourteen-year-old Celeste Rivas Hernandez. Witnesses included friends, managers, and family members — individuals allegedly close enough to the defendant and the circumstances to require sworn testimony. Court records indicate Burke's parents and brother were among those subpoenaed. His mother reportedly managed his business finances.
According to prosecutors, Celeste was allegedly killed because she threatened to disclose a relationship that reportedly commenced when she was thirteen. The alleged conduct prosecutors describe extends beyond the homicide charge. The case involves alleged interstate and international travel with a minor, alleged financial manipulation including a reported thousand-dollar payment to a classmate to reportedly provide Celeste a new phone after her parents confiscated hers, and alleged systematic isolation from protective adults.
The alleged disposal evidence is detailed in prosecution filings: chainsaw purchases reportedly made under a fictitious name, a body bag, a burn cage, and allegations that a second individual may have been involved in the disposal plan before reportedly withdrawing — allegedly leaving the remains in a vehicle for an extended period. Federal jurisdiction questions arise from the alleged transportation of a minor across state lines.
Burke's manager was reportedly overheard telling counsel that contacting law enforcement after allegedly learning about the body was not his obligation. Friends reportedly accepted a cover story characterizing the fourteen-year-old as a nineteen-year-old college student. In Burke's Discord server, a participant reportedly referenced the missing girl months after she was reported missing. No one reportedly acted on it.
Robin Dreeke applies FBI behavioral analysis expertise to the alleged patterns. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott examines the psychology of alleged bystander failure in professional environments — the mechanisms of loyalty, financial dependence, and willful blindness that reportedly allow alleged harm to allegedly continue uninterrupted. Burke has pleaded not guilty and maintains his innocence.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#D4VD #CelesteRivasHernandez #DavidAnthonyBurke #JusticeForCeleste #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #GrandJury #FederalJurisdiction #ShavaunScott #RobinDreeke