True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

The Kelsey Fitzsimmons bench trial has concluded its evidentiary phase. Both sides have rested. Closing arguments are pending, with a verdict potentially to follow the same day. A single judge will determine whether the single count — assault with a dangerous weapon — is supported beyond a reasonable doubt.
The central factual dispute: the prosecution contends that Fitzsimmons, a former North Andover police officer, raised her service weapon and directed it at Officer Patrick Noonan's face, pulled the trigger on an unchambered round, and racked the slide before Noonan discharged his weapon. The defense contends the weapon was raised to Fitzsimmons's own temple throughout — that this was a mental health crisis and suicide attempt, not an assault — and that Fitzsimmons was shot while in crisis, not while threatening another officer.
Fitzsimmons testified in her own defense on day three, providing her account of the sequence directly. Her testimony included statements made in the ambulance following the shooting. A neighbor of Noonan's also testified on day three. Fitzsimmons's mother testified that she was present in the home, heard two shots, and did not hear her daughter speak. A defense-requested site visit, litigated over two days, was cancelled without explanation following Fitzsimmons's testimony.
Of legal significance: the grand jury declined to indict on armed assault with intent to murder prior to trial — the top charge the prosecution originally pursued. The case proceeded on the lesser assault count. Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta examines what that pre-trial grand jury outcome signals about the evidentiary posture, the strategic calculus behind the bench trial election, and the legal architecture of a mental health defense that incorporates postpartum depression, prior on-duty trauma, and post-incident clinical findings without becoming a prosecution narrative. Retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke addresses the evidentiary weight of behavioral testimony and what officer statements on scene — including the words spoken immediately before the shot was fired — communicate about real-time perception under stress. Martha Coakley, former Massachusetts Attorney General, leads the defense.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#KelseyFitzsimmons #NorthAndoverPolice #BenchTrial #TrueCrimeToday #HiddenKillers #BobMotta #RobinDreeke #MarthaCoakley #MentalHealthCrisis #MassachusettsTrial

The legal and institutional framework surrounding Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos now involves three simultaneous tracks: a 241-0 no-confidence vote from the deputies' union, a unanimous Board of Supervisors invocation of a territorial statute requiring sworn statements under threat of removal, and an active recall campaign. Supervisor Matt Heinz publicly characterized Nanos's 42-year Pima County tenure as "fruit of a poison tree" and stated that Nanos's answer in a December 2025 deposition is "disqualifying for any county employee, but especially one in law enforcement."
The critical procedural development: Nanos has stated he will comply with the board's order. The statute invoked ties its removal mechanism to non-compliance — refusal to submit sworn statements — not to the adequacy or content of those statements. Whether compliance, even if the board finds the substance deficient, provides a legal basis for removal under this specific statute is a question county attorneys are currently working to resolve. The board's next scheduled meeting is April 7, at which point outside counsel is expected to present draft language and the board will determine next steps.
This episode provides a full procedural breakdown of the statute's scope, the December deposition at issue and its legal implications, the recall campaign's procedural threshold and timeline, and what each possible outcome means for the active kidnapping investigation.
Former FBI Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program Chief Robin Dreeke then addresses listener questions on the operational and behavioral dimensions: what command-level instability does to active investigators, what the sustained pattern of Nanos's public communications signals from a behavioral analysis standpoint, and how the FBI's involvement functions — or is complicated — under conditions of jurisdictional friction at the sheriff level.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#NancyGuthrie #ChrisNanos #SavannahGuthrie #TrueCrimeToday #MissingPersons #HiddenKillers #PimaCounty #FBI #BringNancyHome #RobinDreeke

The conviction of Kouri Richins closed the criminal case. The behavioral and psychological record it produced is worth examining on its own terms — because it maps precisely onto a pattern that shows up in case after case, and understanding that pattern is what makes prosecution and prevention possible.
This week on True Crime Today, Tony Brueski, psychotherapist Shavaun Scott, and retired FBI Behavioral Analysis Chief Robin Dreeke examine the Richins case through the clinical and behavioral lens — using the documented record of the Denise Williams case as the parallel that demonstrates how these cases always resolve.
Denise Williams' husband Mike Williams disappeared in December 2000. The official determination: accidental drowning. Denise collected $1.75 million in insurance and married Brian Winchester — the man who shot Mike and buried him approximately five miles from Mike's mother's home. The con held for seventeen years. It broke when Winchester's own legal exposure made silence a worse option than cooperation. He confessed. Led investigators to the body. Denise Williams was convicted.
The structural mechanism is the same in every case. The long con holds only as long as every participant's silence serves their own interest. The moment that calculation shifts — for a co-conspirator, a witness, a friend, a housekeeper — the evidentiary foundation collapses.
Shavaun Scott examines the coercive control framework documented in the Richins case — the financial manipulation, the isolation, the escalation pattern that prosecutors allege preceded Eric Richins' death as he moved quietly toward restructuring his estate and protecting his children. She addresses what the clinical literature establishes about the specific danger point in controlling relationships when the controlled party moves toward exit — and what the Richins case adds to that record.
The verdict is rendered. The pattern it documents deserves full examination.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#KouriRichins #EricRichins #DeniseWilliams #TrueCrimeLaw #CoerciveControl #ShavaunScott #RobinDreeke #TrueCrimeToday #HiddenKillers #PerfectWife

The criminal cases involving members of the Duggar family do not exist in a vacuum. They exist inside a documented institutional framework — and understanding that framework is essential to understanding how these cases developed, why disclosure took years, and why accountability has been so difficult to reach at every level.
This week on True Crime Today, Tony Brueski examines the Institute in Basic Life Principles — the organization whose doctrine shaped the Duggar household — alongside psychotherapist Shavaun Scott and retired FBI Behavioral Analysis Chief Robin Dreeke.
The IBLP's Umbrella of Authority doctrine assigns absolute authority to fathers within the family unit, submission to wives, and unquestioning obedience to children. The organization's own published materials describe questioning that authority structure as spiritual rebellion and characterize leaving it as witchcraft. Sex education was systematically excluded from the IBLP homeschool curriculum. Published IBLP guidance characterized fear of dying in pregnancy as satanic. These are documented positions from the organization's own materials.
The institutional record of IBLP's founder, Bill Gothard, is directly relevant. More than 34 women have accused Gothard of harassment and sexual assault. At 91 years old, he has never faced criminal charges. The organization he founded continues to operate. Shavaun Scott and Robin Dreeke examine what it means procedurally and behaviorally when an institution is specifically structured to prevent accountability from reaching its leadership — and what that structure produces in the families living inside it.
The delayed disclosures in the Joseph Duggar case — a victim who waited years before coming forward — are examined through the specific lens of what the IBLP curriculum did and did not teach children about recognizing and reporting harm. The absence of that framework is not incidental. Former members and clinicians who have worked with survivors consistently identify it as structural and intentional.
This is Part 1 of 3. The institutional record is the foundation.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#IBLP #BillGothard #DuggarFamily #TrueCrimeLaw #ReligiousAbuse #ShavaunScott #RobinDreeke #TrueCrimeToday #HiddenKillers #19KidsAndCounting

In December 2025 — six weeks before Nancy Guthrie disappeared from her Tucson home — Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos gave a sworn deposition. Asked directly whether he had ever been suspended during his law enforcement career, he answered no. El Paso Police Department employment records obtained by the Arizona Republic show eight suspensions and 37 days without pay between 1977 and 1982, including a 15-day suspension following an arrest in which a robbery suspect named Carlos Urias allegedly ended up in intensive care. Nanos resigned from the El Paso department in 1982 — two years earlier than his publicly posted résumé stated.
This week on True Crime Today, Tony Brueski examines the full legal and institutional record and what it means for an unsolved investigation.
The institutional response to the surfaced records has been formal and significant. The Pima County deputies' union — representing 300 of Nanos' own officers — passed a unanimous no-confidence vote and called for his immediate resignation. The Pima County Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to compel sworn reports from Nanos under oath, directing outside counsel to draft the legal language. Non-compliance with that order carries a specific consequence: the board can vote to vacate his seat after ten days of non-compliance. Supervisor Matt Heinz said publicly that Nanos' 42-year record in Pima County "seems to be based on fraud." The board is set to review draft removal language at an April 7 meeting.
Against this backdrop, the investigation into Nancy Guthrie's disappearance continues with no arrest and no publicly named suspect. The FBI is reportedly conducting targeted inquiries with neighbors specifically about people who moved out of the area before she disappeared — a departure from standard canvas procedure that carries procedural implications Robin Dreeke addresses in the companion episode. January 11th has been flagged by the family as a date of significance weeks before Nancy vanished. Law enforcement has made no public statement about it.
Every sworn statement Nanos has made in connection with this investigation now carries the weight of a deposition record that the documentary evidence directly contradicts.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#NancyGuthrie #SheriffNanos #ChrisNanos #TrueCrimeLaw #PimaCounty #SheriffRecall #TrueCrimeToday #FindNancyGuthrie #LawEnforcementAccountability #MissingPerson