True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

The murder of Jared Bridegan on February 16th, 2022 didn't begin on a dark road in Jacksonville. It began years earlier — in court filings, custody disputes, and a slow psychological deterioration that the people around it either didn't see coming or didn't know how to name.
In Part 1 of One Mile From Home, Tony Brueski takes the Bridegan case out of the headlines and into the psychology — specifically, the research-documented process called grievance identity consolidation. The point at which a conflict stops being something a person is navigating and becomes something a person is built around. Where resentment stops seeking resolution and starts seeking elimination.
This episode also examines the financial dimension that prosecutors argue gave the emotional conflict a dollar amount — a trust fund structured to release to Gardner only once her legal obligations to Jared ended. According to the prosecution's theory, his existence wasn't just an ongoing source of conflict. It was a financial obstacle with a specific bottom line.
This is not a timeline recap of the case. It is a psychological dissection of how years of unresolved, consuming conflict reshapes a person's inner world — and what that reshaped world eventually makes possible. Built for people who've lived adjacent to exactly this kind of dynamic and want to understand it more honestly than the headlines allow.
Shanna Gardner and Mario Fernandez have pleaded not guilty. Trial is currently scheduled for August 2026.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#JaredBridegan #ShannaGardner #MurderForHire #OneMileFromHome #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #CustodyDisputeMurder #TrueCrimePsychology #HighConflictDivorce #MarioFernandez

Kouri Richins has been convicted of first-degree murder in the death of her husband Eric Richins following a Summit County trial in which the prosecution established he died from a lethal dose of fentanyl administered without his knowledge. The jury reached its verdict despite the absence of a physically recovered murder weapon and credibility challenges to the prosecution's star witness — a combination that in many cases is sufficient to support a reasonable doubt defense.
The documentary record proved central. Approximately 18 months before his death, Eric Richins executed a formal estate restructuring with communications to his attorney explicitly stating his purpose was to protect his children from Kouri Richins. That prior legal act — memorialized in attorney-client correspondence by the victim himself before his death — provided the jury with a pre-mortem account of the domestic circumstances that no trial witness could have independently provided or undermined.
The financial evidence amplified that foundation: undisclosed debts attributed to Kouri Richins, insurance policies Eric Richins allegedly had no knowledge of, and alleged signature forgeries. No individual element was independently dispositive. As a cumulative pattern, they constructed a motive framework the defense chose not to address through testimony.
The appellate record carries material worth evaluating. A coaching video connected to the prosecution's star witness raised procedural concerns. That witness sustained public credibility damage during cross-examination. The lead detective's sworn testimony included an acknowledgment that fentanyl was not physically recovered from the crime scene. Whether those issues satisfy the threshold for reversible error requires analysis of whether they individually or cumulatively affected the verdict in a way an appellate court would deem prejudicial.
Sentencing follows conviction. The position Kouri Richins takes at that proceeding — continued assertion of innocence or expression of remorse — carries both legal and strategic implications for the appeal timeline.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#KouriRichins #EricRichins #TrueCrimeLaw #FentanylMurder #GuiltyVerdict #AppealAnalysis #TrueCrimeToday #JenniferCoffindaffer #CriminalJustice #MurderConviction

Former 19 Kids and Counting star Joseph Garrett Duggar was arrested on March 18th, 2026 on serious charges involving a minor. According to the Bay County Sheriff's Office in Florida, Duggar allegedly harmed a young girl on multiple occasions during a 2020 family vacation in Panama City Beach. The victim, now 14, came forward during a recent forensic interview. When her father confronted Duggar, he allegedly admitted it. When a detective was placed on that same call, he allegedly admitted it again.
Joseph is the younger brother of Josh Duggar, currently serving 12 and a half years in federal prison following a 2021 conviction on federal charges involving illegal content depicting minors. Before Josh's federal conviction, it was revealed he had harmed five young victims between 2002 and 2003 — four of them his own sisters. Jim Bob and Michelle Duggar knew and chose internal church counseling over reporting it to law enforcement. The statute of limitations ran out. No charges were ever filed.
According to Fox 5 Atlanta, Jim Bob and Michelle reportedly told authorities they were aware of the allegations involving Joseph and reportedly handled the matter through internal church counseling rather than contacting police. That reporting has not been independently confirmed and neither has publicly commented.
On Hidden Killers, host Tony Brueski goes beyond the arrest and into the machinery behind it — the IBLP fundamentalist belief system that taught that silence was a virtue and obedience to male authority was non-negotiable, the step-by-step timeline of how prior allegations were handled inside this family over more than a decade, the fact that Jim Bob publicly campaigned on the harshest possible platform for exactly these types of offenses in 2002 while his family was managing a similar situation at home, TLC's decade of profits from this family, and the Duggar children who finally walked away and what they had to say when they did.
Joseph Duggar awaits extradition to Florida. The family has not issued a statement. The pattern has.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#JosephDuggar #DuggarArrested #19KidsAndCounting #JimBobDuggar #IBLP #JoshDuggar #DuggarFamily #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #FundamentalistChristianity

He's been the face of the Nancy Guthrie investigation since day one — standing at podiums, giving interviews, telling the nation he has it handled. But in December 2025, six weeks before Nancy Guthrie disappeared, Chris Nanos sat in a sworn deposition and told an attorney he had never been suspended in forty years of law enforcement. The documents tell a completely different story.
The Arizona Republic obtained his actual El Paso Police Department employment file. Eight suspensions. Thirty-seven days without pay. Twenty-six separate internal affairs allegations over five years. A robbery suspect who ended up in the hospital's intensive care unit. A grand jury convened to examine his conduct. And a forced resignation in August 1982 that he apparently buried for four decades — including on a publicly posted résumé that contained multiple inaccuracies, all in his favor.
True Crime Today breaks down the full record: the El Paso years in detail, the unexplained two-year gap in his biography, the résumé discrepancies, the deposition answer, and the Pima County history that followed — a federal investigation into his own department, AG findings on a mishandled sexual assault case, the suppression of political opponents before an election, and now a formal recall with the clock running.
Forty-seven days. No arrest. No suspect. No press conference. This is who has been running this case.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#NancyGuthrie #SheriffNanos #PimaCounty #NancyGuthrieCase #SheriffMisconduct #ChrisNanos #LawEnforcementAccountability #SavannahGuthrie #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers

A formal recall proceeding is now underway against the sheriff leading the Nancy Guthrie missing persons investigation, following documented evidence that sworn deposition testimony he provided regarding his prior law enforcement career was contradicted by official agency records. Those records reportedly reflect a separation rather than voluntary resignation, with a disciplinary history including excessive force findings, insubordination, and off-duty gambling violations.
The legal implications are layered. A lead investigator with a documented credibility problem — now the subject of an active recall proceeding — affects not only the evidentiary weight of his statements about the case, but potentially the chain of custody and admissibility of evidence collected under his direction. Whether any material processed through this investigation will withstand a challenge to foundational reliability is a question that hasn't been fully litigated.
Separately, the forensic picture carries procedural complications independent of the recall. The crime scene was reportedly released earlier than standard investigative protocol. Biological evidence was processed through a private laboratory rather than a government facility. Chain of custody has been publicly challenged. Forensic genetic genealogy is actively in play as an investigative tool, but its courtroom viability depends on whether the underlying biological samples remain legally defensible.
January 24th has been added to the investigation's dates of interest alongside January 11th — both Saturdays, approximately two weeks apart. Camera footage from additional angles at Nancy Guthrie's property was reviewed and yielded nothing. The suspect does not appear beyond a single doorbell image. FBI veterans have publicly stated the ransom motive appears increasingly unlikely, which would require a fundamental reassessment of the current investigative framework and suspect profile.
Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer examines the legal and procedural stakes in this conversation.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#NancyGuthrie #SheriffRecall #TrueCrimeLaw #MissingPersonsCase #ForensicGenealogy #EvidenceChainOfCustody #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrueCrimeToday #CriminalJustice #RecallProceeding