True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

Five days into the Tupac Shakur murder trial, the case against Duane "Keffe D" Davis is built almost entirely from his own recordings. The newest one played for jurors contains his unfiltered reaction to learning Tupac was dead. This recap covers the September 2009 interview in full. Davis describes a search that began at Club 662 after the MGM Grand beating of Orlando Anderson. He describes a Glock from a secret compartment, a handoff to the back seat, and five or six shots he says Orlando fired at Suge Knight. Davis even asked the Las Vegas detective to step out of the room partway through, continuing his account with only the LAPD detective and his own lawyer present. The television chapter got its own testimony. Davis took money for a docuseries, and a sealed federal proffer recording traveled from investigators to a director's editing bay. A defamation letter from Sean Combs' attorney over a related documentary never turned into a lawsuit. Combs has denied any role in the killing, has never been a suspect, and is charged with nothing here. Friday closed with Davis rising to accuse the prosecutor of ruining his life. The trial picks back up Monday morning, and there's more tape to come.
Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
Hashtags: #TupacShakur #KeffeD #TrueCrimeToday #DuaneDavis #TupacMurderTrial #TrueCrime #LasVegas #SugeKnight #DailyTrialRecap #2Pac

The prosecution called more than seventy witnesses over fourteen days at Plymouth Superior Court. Under cross-examination, the witnesses who personally knew Lindsay Clancy all described the same person: a wonderful, nurturing mother who always wanted a family. Patrick Clancy said it on the stand. Her friends confirmed it. Former co-workers echoed it. The defense didn’t need to call a single character witness.
The defense’s forensic psychologist testified that Lindsay told him a male voice ordered her to kill her children, and that she had no appreciation for the wrongfulness of what she did. Her hospital records from days after the killings list “critically ill, postpartum psychosis.” A hospital psychiatrist testified she appeared calm and cooperative during the same period.
Lindsay’s mother told the jury that her daughter said the medication was destroying her mind and begged for help. The prosecution’s cross-examination response was to ask why the family didn’t intervene more aggressively.
Eric Faddis, defense attorney and former prosecutor, evaluates what the prosecution left this jury with and whether it’s enough.
Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #TrueCrimeToday #PostpartumPsychosis #InsanityDefense #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #KevinReddington #DrPaulZeizel #TrueCrime #Duxbury

The insanity defense in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial ran into its toughest witness yet today: Dr. Kirk Heilbrun, a forensic psychologist testifying for the prosecution. Clancy, 34, of Duxbury, Massachusetts, is accused of strangling her three children — 5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson, and 7-month-old Callan — with exercise resistance bands inside the family's Summer Street home on January 24, 2023. She faces three counts of murder and three counts of strangulation, has pleaded not guilty, and her attorney Kevin Reddington argues she was in the grip of severe postpartum psychosis and psychiatric overmedication when it happened.
Heilbrun evaluated Clancy three years after the fact and testified that she tends to underreport or minimize her symptoms — an odd thing for a prosecution witness to concede, and worth noting he didn't downplay her suicide attempt at all. He called it serious, said she remains on one-to-one suicide watch at Tewksbury, and said she's still considered at risk today. Where he broke from the defense is on motive: he testified he doesn't think psychosis drove the killings — he thinks Clancy was trying to spare her children from suffering after she took her own life. He noted her symptoms appeared only during the offense, with no accompanying delusions, and that the voice repeating "this is your last chance" registers to him as intrusive thoughts rather than a command hallucination. He also flagged that her first words to her husband afterward were "I tried to kill myself" — not a reference to any voice.
It's the kind of testimony that doesn't need commentary to land. The trial continues in Plymouth Superior Court.

Links
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

Disclaimer
Content on this site is based on publicly available information and reflects commentary and opinion. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty. Nothing published here constitutes legal, medical, or professional advice.

Hashtags
#LindsayClancy #DuxburyTragedy #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrime #PlymouthCounty #CoraDawsonCallan #InsanityDefense #KevinReddington #TrueCrimeToday #Breaking

The prosecution's own rebuttal witness may have handed the defense some of its strongest material yet in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial. Forensic psychologist Dr. Kirk Heilbrun testified Monday about the months before Clancy allegedly strangled her three children — 5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson, and 7-month-old Callan — with exercise resistance bands inside the family's Summer Street home on January 24, 2023 in Duxbury, Massachusetts. Clancy, 34, faces three counts of murder and three counts of strangulation, has pleaded not guilty, and her attorney Kevin Reddington is arguing severe postpartum psychosis and psychiatric overmedication.
Heilbrun began with a lesson in retention bias — the pull toward favoring whoever's paying for the evaluation — then detailed the scope of his own work: about 180 hours combing through police, medical, and court records plus surveillance footage, 10.5 hours testing and meeting with Clancy directly, and 1.5 hours of collateral interviews. His timeline was specific. Limited medical history and mild anxiety before September 2022. Worsening anxiety and depression after October 2022. By December 2022, intrusive and unwelcome thoughts about self-harm and, at times, harming the children — thoughts, he clarified, not hallucinations.
Then came the diagnostic contradiction: Heilbrun found no evidence in the records of mania or hypomania consistent with bipolar disorder, even though Tewksbury Hospital had Clancy diagnosed with bipolar disorder for three and a half years. His own conclusion was bipolar II. He closed by outlining the legal insanity standard — mental disease or defect, capacity to know right from wrong, and ability to control conduct. After the killings, Clancy allegedly attempted suicide by jumping from a second-story window and is now paralyzed from the waist down. The trial continues in Plymouth Superior Court.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#LindsayClancy #DuxburyTragedy #PostpartumPsychosis #TrueCrime #PlymouthCounty #CoraDawsonCallan #InsanityDefense #KevinReddington #TrueCrimeToday #Breaking

Prosecutors in the Lindsay Clancy trial called a psychiatrist to prove she was responsible for killing her three children. He built that opinion on something she told him: that she said "go to God" as she tightened an exercise band around each of their necks.
Dr. Avram Mack evaluated Clancy for the Plymouth County District Attorney in April 2026. He diagnosed major depression, found no evidence of psychosis or bipolar disorder before the killings, and said the killings were methodical and aimed at a goal. He also said Clancy told him she doubts the bipolar diagnosis she's being treated for at Tewksbury State Hospital.
The defense's final witness, Dr. Phillip Resnick, read the same words as delusion. He testified Clancy was obsessive about caring for her kids and believed, through psychotic thinking, that taking them to heaven with her was morally right. Resnick examined her in May 2023 and has worked roughly eighty cases involving parents accused of killing children.
Tony Brueski explains why the two experts cancel each other out and why Massachusetts puts the burden on the Commonwealth. He also argues that Mack's statement that psychosis doesn't automatically erase knowledge of right from wrong weakens the prosecution's month-long focus on whether Clancy was psychotic. Clancy has pleaded not guilty to three first-degree murder counts. Prosecutors allege premeditation. Mack's cross continues, with two more state experts expected before closing arguments.
Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#LindsayClancy #AvramMack #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #ClancyTrial #PostpartumPsychosis #Duxbury #PhillipResnick #MurderTrial #TrueCrimePodcast