True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

A California civil jury has delivered the largest judgment Bill Cosby has ever faced. Here's how a case from 1972 made it to a Santa Monica courtroom in 2026 — and what the verdict actually means legally.
On March 23, 2026, jurors found Cosby liable for the sexual battery and assault of an intoxicated person under California civil law, awarding plaintiff Donna Motsinger $17.5 million in past non-economic damages, $1.75 million in future damages, and — following a separate punitive phase the same afternoon — $40 million in punitive damages, for a total of $59.25 million. The punitive award required the jury to find that Cosby acted with malice, oppression, or fraud, a legal threshold they met after deliberating on pattern evidence and Cosby's own prior deposition testimony.
The case was filed in 2023 under California's lookback window legislation, signed by Governor Newsom in 2022, which temporarily suspended the civil statute of limitations for older sexual assault claims. Without that law, Motsinger's suit would have been time-barred decades ago. Motsinger had previously appeared as an anonymous witness — Jane Doe Number 8 — in the 2005 Constand civil case, which resolved in a private settlement before reaching trial.
At the Motsinger trial, the court admitted testimony from Andrea Constand, Victoria Valentino, and Janice Baker Kinney under California's common plan or design evidentiary standard, allowing the jury to consider a documented pattern of alleged conduct. Closing arguments included excerpts from a Cosby deposition in which he acknowledged prescribing himself Quaaludes with the stated purpose of giving them to women and admitted he did not evaluate whether those women could give meaningful consent.
Cosby's legal team has announced an appeal. Whether Motsinger will collect on the judgment depends on Cosby's actual assets and the outcome of that appellate process — both of which remain contested.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#BillCosby #DonnaMotsinger #CivilVerdict #TrueCrimeToday #CaliforniaLaw #PunitiveDamages #StatuteOfLimitations #SexualAssaultLaw #TrueCrime #CosbyCivilCase

The legal and investigative dimensions of the Nancy Guthrie disappearance have grown increasingly intertwined, and True Crime Today examines what the current conditions mean for the active case.
From an investigative standpoint: Nancy Guthrie, 84, the mother of NBC News anchor Savannah Guthrie, has been missing from her Catalina Foothills, Arizona home since early February. The FBI and Pima County Sheriff's Department are co-leading the investigation. DNA recovered from the crime scene and from gloves found in the vicinity has produced no matches in CODIS, the FBI-managed national genetic database. Investigators have been requesting footage specifically from January 11, several weeks prior to the abduction, suggesting evidence of possible pre-operational activity. No suspect has been publicly identified or charged.
From an institutional standpoint: The lead law enforcement official, Sheriff Chris Nanos, is simultaneously subject to a unanimous no-confidence vote from his deputies union of more than 300 officers, a Board of Supervisors order requiring sworn departmental reporting — with the draft language set for review at a board meeting on April 7 — and an active recall effort requiring 122,000-plus signatures by July 10. These developments stem from the emergence of undisclosed disciplinary records from Nanos' El Paso PD tenure, records that directly contradict sworn testimony he provided.
The question of whether command-level institutional disruption affects the quality of active investigative work, and what conditions would be required to advance this case toward resolution, is addressed directly by retired FBI Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program Chief Robin Dreeke in this episode.
The investigation continues. No arrest has been made.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#NancyGuthrie #ChrisNanos #PimaCounty #TrueCrimeLaw #FBI #MissingPersons #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #Investigation #SavannahGuthrie

The legal picture surrounding Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos has sharpened considerably, and the implications for the Nancy Guthrie investigation are significant.
Under sworn testimony, Nanos stated he had never been suspended during his law enforcement career. Documented records from his tenure with the El Paso Police Department indicate otherwise, revealing a history of suspensions and conduct issues. When the discrepancy emerged publicly, Nanos' office clarified that his sworn statement pertained specifically to his Pima County career.
The distinction matters legally. And it did not go unnoticed.
The union representing more than 300 Pima County Sheriff's deputies voted unanimously no confidence and called for Nanos to resign immediately. The Board of Supervisors has directed its legal counsel to draft language requiring Nanos to provide reports under oath regarding his department — language set for review at a board meeting on April 7. Pima County Supervisor Matt Heinz stated publicly that Nanos' 42-year Pima County career "seems to be based on fraud."
Nanos, who has three years remaining in his term after winning election by 481 votes, stated within hours of the compliance directive that he would comply. Legal observers have noted that compliance under these specific circumstances effectively forecloses the procedural pathway to removal.
A recall effort is underway, requiring more than 122,000 signatures by July 10 to place the matter before voters in 2027. No arrest has been made in the Nancy Guthrie case. No suspect has been publicly identified.
Retired FBI Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program Chief Robin Dreeke provides professional assessment of what the documented behavioral record of Nanos' conduct reveals — grounded in publicly available facts, not opinion.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#ChrisNanos #NancyGuthrie #PimaCounty #TrueCrimeLaw #SheriffNanos #NoConfidenceVote #Recall #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #MissingPersons

The characteristics assembled around Bryan Kohberger after his arrest — socially awkward, intensely focused, isolated, preoccupied with dark subject matter — describe an enormous population of people who have never harmed anyone and never will. And nobody is talking about what it costs those people when a profile like this gets built.
True Crime Today presents Part Four of The Shape of Him from Hidden Killers host Tony Brueski — the most uncommon episode in the series, and possibly the most necessary. It examines what it actually feels like to live inside a behavioral description that was assembled around someone else's alleged act. The experience of knowing you are being monitored without being able to address it directly. The impossible trap of a concern you cannot disprove because it was never based on anything you did. The exhaustion of it.
This episode makes the case clearly: fitting a profile is not evidence. The behavioral overlap between people who match this description and people who actually pose risk is enormous. The false positive rate is not a small problem — it is the structural reality of behavioral profiling. And the cost of treating it otherwise falls on real people who carry it quietly with no acknowledgment.
It also speaks directly to the true crime audience about their own relationship to this content — and what that relationship actually reflects. Part four of five. New episodes weekly.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#BryanKohberger #TrueCrimePsychology #IdahoMurders #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #ProfileBurden #TheShapeOfHim #WomenAndTrueCrime #MoscowIdaho #CriminalPsychology

Two Duggar brothers are facing criminal charges. One is in federal prison. Their father has faced no legal consequences. The organization that produced this family is still running. And a 14-year-old girl is in the middle of an active criminal investigation involving one of the most recognized families in reality television history.
In this complete three-part series from Hidden Killers and True Crime Today, hosts Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke sit down with psychotherapist Shavaun Scott to examine every dimension of the Duggar story that the crime reports don't cover. Scott is a thirty-year licensed clinician specializing in trauma recovery, forensic psychology, and the psychology of violent behavior — and a survivor of fundamentalist religious upbringing herself.
Part 1 covers the system. IBLP's doctrine, control mechanisms, and what they were designed to produce — examined by someone who lived inside a system like it and has spent thirty years helping people recover from them.
Part 2 covers the men. Josh, Joseph, and Jim Bob Duggar through a forensic clinical lens. What do their patterns reveal? What does the research say about offenders who receive faith-based handling instead of clinical treatment? What keeps the women in their lives inside a world that has produced these outcomes?
Part 3 covers the survivors. What recovery actually takes. What the people most affected by this week's events need right now. And what hundreds of thousands of former IBLP members — who have been saying this for years — need from this moment.
Three parts. The full picture.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#DuggarFamily #IBLP #ShavaunScott #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #ReligiousAbuse #DuggarFamilySecrets #ForensicPsychology #TraumaRecovery