True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

There's a reason legal analysts are watching the d4vd murder case closely, and it isn't just the celebrity name attached to it. David Anthony Burke has been held to answer on first-degree murder with special circumstances in the death of fourteen-year-old Celeste Rivas Hernandez, along with charges tied to illegal conduct with a minor and unlawful mutilation of her remains. 
What makes this hearing worth breaking down is the defense strategy itself. Attorney Blair Berk pushed the medical examiner to concede he couldn't rule out that Celeste's wounds happened after she died, then introduced messages where Celeste referenced self-harm, laying groundwork for reasonable doubt before a single juror is seated. 
The physical evidence complicates things further. Three chainsaws recovered from Burke's home tested negative for blood and were never collected by LAPD, a gap the defense can exploit at trial. Prosecutors counter with a tight twenty-one-minute window between Celeste's Uber arrival and her phone going dark, plus testimony that both families were aware of the relationship well before Celeste's death — undercut by her father's public denial of any contact with Burke. 
Burke's music career adds its own layer: an Interscope deal reportedly worth up to nineteen million dollars, now sitting alongside a death-penalty-eligible murder case. He's pleaded not guilty to every charge. Arraignment is scheduled for August 31st. 
This is a case where the evidence, the money, and the legal strategy are all colliding at once, and the preliminary hearing is only the opening round of what's coming. 
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ 
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod 
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod 
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. 
#CelesteRivas #D4vd #TrueCrime #DavidAnthonyBurke #HiddenKillers #JusticeForCeleste #MurderTrial #TrueCrimePodcast #CriminalJustice #DeathPenalty

Three FBI sources. Three different answers. One question: are the ransom notes in the Nancy Guthrie kidnapping real? On the same day in July, Reuters, the Phoenix field office, and TMZ's sources each gave the public a different version of the same evidence. 
Tony Brueski breaks down what each version would mean for the case. If every note is fabricated, six months of investigating may have been built on a theory that never held up. If some are genuine, the Bureau has information it hasn't shared publicly. And if federal sources can't agree internally, every decision made since Nancy vanished from her Tucson home in January rests on a foundation nobody actually trusts. 
The disagreement surfaced the same week Savannah Guthrie posted a message to her mother's abductor that sounded nothing like the six months of messages before it — no demand for proof of life, no we're ready to talk, just something that sounded like she already knows how this ends. 
Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer has posted a ten-point public challenge to investigators. One of her questions still has no answer. 
Six months. 150 agents. Over 13,000 tips. Zero suspects named. And now the Bureau can't even agree with itself on what the evidence says. 
Links 
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ 
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod 
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod 
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. 
Hashtags 
#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #Tucson #FBI #PimaCounty #RansomNotes #JenniferCoffindaffer #ColdCase

Bryan Kohberger stood in front of the families of Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin, and said nothing. He also walked past his own mother without turning his head. 
That moment sits at the center of a story that just got more complicated. On July 27, 2026, Kohberger filed a handwritten petition from his cell, arguing his own attorneys were ineffective and that he was convinced to falsely confess to the Idaho student murders. He's representing himself now. He told a New York Times reporter before he told his own family. 
Tony Brueski connects the sentencing hearing to the petition that followed it a year later: the plea entered in open court, the silence when the judge offered him the floor, and the specific phrase he used in his filing — that his innocence is his truth, not a claim he's asking anyone to test. 
Kaylee Goncalves' sister was close enough at sentencing to watch the moment with his mother happen in real time. This episode covers what that moment looked like, what the petition says now, and what it means for a family that spent years rebuilding a son who is currently rewriting his own version of events without them. 
This is the part of the story that isn't in the court filings — the family left finding out secondhand. 
Links 
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ 
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod 
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod 
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. 
Hashtags 
#BryanKohberger #IdahoStudentMurders #TrueCrimeToday #KohbergerCase #MoscowIdaho #TrueCrime #IdahoMurders #KohbergerPetition #UniversityOfIdaho #TrueCrimePodcast

Prosecutors in the Lindsay Clancy trial had their pick of witnesses to open with. They chose the father of the three children she's accused of killing, and built their first afternoon in court around a bag of nine pill bottles. 
Patrick Clancy had to describe Cora, Dawson, and Callan to the jury before anyone mentioned January 24, 2023. Then a prosecutor read him the counts on nine prescription bottles, one at a time, and asked how much was missing from each. The state says a woman who barely touched her prescriptions can't turn around and blame them. The defense points to thirteen prescriptions written by multiple prescribers across four months, with nobody connecting the pattern until it was too late. 
Tony Brueski lays out why that choice of opening witness says as much as anything in the testimony itself, what the videos of Lindsay looking completely fine are actually meant to prove, and the number Patrick gave investigators that sent him looking for his own lawyer before this case ever reached a courtroom. 
The prosecution told the jury this case isn't about how the medical system treats women. Their first witness spent the afternoon proving otherwise. 
Links 
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ 
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod 
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod 
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. 
Hashtags 
#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #TrueCrimeToday #ClancyTrial #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #DuxburyMassachusetts #PostpartumPsychosis #InsanityDefense #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast

Celeste Rivas Hernandez's fingers were removed because of this, according to a detail buried in a prosecution court brief that hasn't gotten the attention it should. We start there and work backward through everything else that came out at the d4vd preliminary hearing. 
A call left David Burke's phone at 12:04 in the morning, from a remote road in Santa Barbara County, to Celeste's number, hours after prosecutors say she had already died. Nobody answered. An LAPD criminalist testified about Bluestar reactions across a garage floor, rubber mats, the bricks beneath them, a rowing machine, a tarp, a charging cord, and a bag of wipes, all presumptive positive. The defense got that same witness to concede she can't call any of it definitively blood, and pointed to two chainsaws never swabbed for DNA. 
Then the hearing's final session, the one prosecutors built their case around. A medical examiner testified Celeste died from two sharp-force wounds and had been dead for weeks before her remains were found. A detective walked the court through her phone, messages dating to when she was eleven, close to fifty images labeled illegal material involving a minor, and texts from January 2024 showing she was thirteen and pregnant. 
Her mother cried through the testimony. Burke has pleaded not guilty to every count against him. A bindover ruling is expected soon, and we go through what the evidence actually supports before that decision comes down. None of it is decided yet. That call belongs to a judge, not to this podcast. 
Links 
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ 
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod 
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod 
Disclaimer 
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. 
Hashtags 
#D4vd #CelesteRivasHernandez #HiddenKillers #DavidBurke #BlairBerk #PreliminaryHearing #TrueCrime #LAPD #JusticeForCeleste #CourtTV