True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

The courtroom heard from three boys who still can’t stand in front of Kouri Richins and speak. Their therapists did it for them — reading handwritten words about a childhood prosecutors say was defined by neglect, fear, locked doors, and a father taken by fentanyl.
One child wrote about being forced to parent his younger siblings while the woman in the house disappeared with neighbors or stayed incapacitated. Another described waking to emergency sirens, not knowing what was happening, and spending years afraid her relatives would show up and drag him away from safety. The youngest put it plainly: he was locked in his room, his brother snuck him meals, his animals died around him, and the woman prosecutors say orchestrated all of it threatened to kill his pet when he wouldn’t comply.
All three asked the judge for the same thing: keep her locked away. Forever. They said they finally feel safe — and that safety disappears the moment she walks free.
And while every one of those words was read aloud, Kouri Richins sat in that courtroom and scoffed. She rolled her eyes at her own children’s pain.
Tony Brueski breaks it all down — including what Kouri had to say for herself afterward. That part might make you angrier than everything the boys wrote.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#KouriRichins #EricRichins #TrueCrimeToday #KouriRichinsTrial #TrueCrime

Three years between the verdict and the reversal. In that time, the defense picked up a perjury conviction against the clerk who tampered with the jury and a Supreme Court opinion restricting the financial evidence that dominated the first trial. The prosecution picked up a complete transcript of Murdaugh’s testimony and additional time to refine its forensic case.
Eric Faddis weighs the advantages from both sides. Murdaugh’s prior testimony is potentially the State’s most valuable asset — a locked-in record that constrains the defense whether Murdaugh testifies again or not. But the defense has something it never had before: an official judicial finding that the first trial was unfair, backed by the harshest language the Supreme Court could muster against a court officer.
Faddis addresses whether Hill’s misconduct can be put before the retrial jury as part of the defense narrative, whether the State has new evidence to bring, and the jury selection challenge that may define the entire proceeding — finding twelve people in South Carolina who haven’t already formed an opinion about this case.

LINKS

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

DISCLAIMER

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

HASHTAGS

#AlexMurdaugh #TrueCrimeToday #MurdaughRetrial #EricFaddis #BeckyHill #SCSupremeCourt #TrueCrime #NewTrial #JurySelection #MurdaughTrial

In late September 2025, the Austin Police Department announced a forensic breakthrough in the 1991 yogurt shop murders. Cold case detective Dan Jackson, who took over the investigation in 2022, resubmitted a .380 shell casing recovered from a floor drain at the crime scene to the National Integrated Ballistic Information Network. Improved software produced a match to an unsolved 1998 homicide in Kentucky. A subsequent Y-STR DNA search across national laboratories returned a complete 27-allele match from the South Carolina State Lab, linking the crime scene profile to serial killer Robert Eugene Brashers through a 1990 murder in Greenville.
Retesting of biological material from victim Amy Ayers’ fingernail clippings confirmed the match to Brashers at a 2.5-million-to-one probability. Brashers, who committed at least eight murders across four states, died by self-inflicted gunshot wound during a 1999 police standoff in Missouri. He was never identified as a suspect in the yogurt shop case during his lifetime. In February 2026, Travis County Judge Dayna Blazey formally exonerated the four men wrongfully accused, declaring them factually innocent.
Part 5 provides a comprehensive account of the forensic methodology, Brashers’ criminal history, and the formal exoneration proceedings. Essential listening for anyone following cold case forensics and DNA identification advances.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#YogurtShopMurders #TrueCrimeToday #ColdCaseSolved #DNAForensics #RobertBrashers #NIBIN #Exoneration #SerialKiller #HiddenKillers #CriminalJustice

There may be one in your town. A charming restaurant with handcrafted furniture, homemade bread, and staff who seem unusually warm and attentive. There are at least thirty-three Yellow Deli locations worldwide, and every one of them is reportedly run by unpaid members of the Twelve Tribes — a group the SPLC classifies as a Christian fundamentalist cult.
In this episode, Tony Brueski asks why the Twelve Tribes is still operating after fifty years of allegations spanning child discipline concerns, forced labor claims, racial doctrine documented as white supremacist, and survivor testimony from three continents.
The answer involves a legal framework that makes intervention in religious communities nearly impossible without immediate, provable harm to a specific individual. The 1984 Vermont raid was ruled unconstitutional. The public defender from the case later joined the group. Germany acted on hidden camera footage in 2013. The European Court of Human Rights upheld the decision. The United States has produced a different outcome on the same evidence.
The group’s financial model is self-sustaining. Its recruitment pipeline runs through its restaurants. Its members are reportedly trained not to cooperate with outside inquiries. And as recently as April 2026, the group closed one Yellow Deli location and opened another in a new community.
The Twelve Tribes is not a historical case. It is a present-tense reality operating in neighborhoods across America. The question is whether knowing what you now know changes what you do the next time you see the sign.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#YellowDeli #12Tribes #TwelveTribes #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #CultExposed #HiddenKillers #StillOperating #ReligiousFreedom #TonyBrueski

The Supreme Court said the prosecution went "far too long and far too deep" into Alex Murdaugh’s financial crimes at the first trial. They singled out testimony with "zero probative value" on motive that existed only to make Murdaugh look like someone who takes advantage of the helpless. Any retrial has to be leaner. The question is whether lean is enough.
Eric Fadds brings his prosecutorial experience to the problem. The State’s motive theory depends on a specific convergence of events in the days before the killings: the CFO’s confrontation about missing fees, the upcoming hearing that would have forced financial disclosure, the tightening noose around years of theft. The court said that timeline is fair game. But the detailed victim testimony, the emotional narratives, the hours of accounting — the court made clear that was propensity evidence dressed up as motive.
Fadds also tackles the evidentiary issues the court left open for the retrial judge to decide — the firearm analysis, the raincoat, the gunshot residue, the iPhone demonstration — and the defense strategy question that underlies everything: concede the financial conduct and attack the motive link, or try to keep all of it out.

LINKS

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

DISCLAIMER

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

HASHTAGS

#AlexMurdaugh #TrueCrimeToday #MurdaughRetrial #MurdaughEvidence #EricFadds #SCSupremeCourt #TrueCrime #FinancialCrimes #Rule403 #MurdaughTrial