True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

Three separate grand juries received testimony in the case against David Anthony Burke, known professionally as D4VD, in connection with the alleged murder of fourteen-year-old Celeste Rivas Hernandez. Witnesses included friends, managers, and family members — individuals allegedly close enough to the defendant and the circumstances to require sworn testimony. Court records indicate Burke's parents and brother were among those subpoenaed. His mother reportedly managed his business finances.
According to prosecutors, Celeste was allegedly killed because she threatened to disclose a relationship that reportedly commenced when she was thirteen. The alleged conduct prosecutors describe extends beyond the homicide charge. The case involves alleged interstate and international travel with a minor, alleged financial manipulation including a reported thousand-dollar payment to a classmate to reportedly provide Celeste a new phone after her parents confiscated hers, and alleged systematic isolation from protective adults.
The alleged disposal evidence is detailed in prosecution filings: chainsaw purchases reportedly made under a fictitious name, a body bag, a burn cage, and allegations that a second individual may have been involved in the disposal plan before reportedly withdrawing — allegedly leaving the remains in a vehicle for an extended period. Federal jurisdiction questions arise from the alleged transportation of a minor across state lines.
Burke's manager was reportedly overheard telling counsel that contacting law enforcement after allegedly learning about the body was not his obligation. Friends reportedly accepted a cover story characterizing the fourteen-year-old as a nineteen-year-old college student. In Burke's Discord server, a participant reportedly referenced the missing girl months after she was reported missing. No one reportedly acted on it.
Robin Dreeke applies FBI behavioral analysis expertise to the alleged patterns. Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott examines the psychology of alleged bystander failure in professional environments — the mechanisms of loyalty, financial dependence, and willful blindness that reportedly allow alleged harm to allegedly continue uninterrupted. Burke has pleaded not guilty and maintains his innocence.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#D4VD #CelesteRivasHernandez #DavidAnthonyBurke #JusticeForCeleste #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #GrandJury #FederalJurisdiction #ShavaunScott #RobinDreeke

The federal trial in the Anna Kepner case was scheduled for June 1. Eighteen days before jury selection, the defense filed Document 74 — an Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial — requesting approximately ninety additional days of preparation. The court granted the motion. The new trial date is September 8.
The procedural context makes the continuance notable. The defense previously moved at exceptional speed for a case carrying two potential life sentences. The defendant, Timothy Hudson — sixteen at the time of the alleged offense — signed a written waiver requesting adult prosecution. No contested transfer hearing was held. No prior continuances were filed. The defense operated on approximately three and a half months from initial discovery production to trial. That timeline is significantly compressed by federal standards.
The continuance motion cited the government's voluminous discovery production, scheduling conflicts arising from lead counsel's involvement in two other federal trials, and family obligations. The prosecution filed no opposition. The absence of a government objection is procedurally significant — in a case where the prosecution has simultaneously sought pretrial detention, agreeing to a three-month delay represents a departure from the posture of urgency.
The strategic implications extend in both directions. The defense's speed-to-trial approach had identifiable advantages: jury trial over bench trial, preservation of pretrial release, and forcing the government to proceed with the case as assembled. The reversal suggests the discovery production altered the defense's assessment of trial readiness.
Unresolved proceedings remain before the September date. The autopsy report is sealed. The government's detention motion is pending — the defendant remains on GPS monitoring at a relative's home rather than in federal custody. Pretrial evidentiary motions have not yet been heard. Federal Rules of Evidence will substantially determine what reaches the jury.
Anna Kepner was eighteen when she was found dead aboard the Carnival Horizon during a family cruise in November 2025. Her father has publicly stated the family is troubled by the defendant's current release conditions.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#AnnaKepner #CarnivalHorizon #TimothyHudson #FederalTrial #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #JusticeForAnna #FederalProcedure #MiamiFederalCourt #CruiseShipCase

Defense counsel Jim Griffin confirmed at a press conference that unknown male DNA was recovered from beneath Maggie Murdaugh's fingernails during the original investigation and was never submitted to CODIS for comparison. The defense has indicated it intends to pursue that evidence at retrial.
The DNA disclosure accompanies a broader catalog of alleged investigative deficiencies the defense plans to present to a second jury. Tire impressions at the crime scene were reportedly never properly processed. GPS data from Maggie Murdaugh's phone was allegedly overwritten. Crime scene integrity was compromised by weather exposure and foot traffic from family members prior to full processing. The medical examiner reportedly estimated time of death by touch rather than standard forensic methodology. These issues were largely subordinated during the first trial by twelve hours of financial crimes testimony — testimony the Supreme Court has now ordered to be sharply curtailed.
Retrial preparation is extensive. The defense is reviewing an eight-thousand-page trial transcript — effectively an impeachment roadmap, as every prosecution witness is now locked into sworn testimony. New expert witnesses are being retained. The defense does not anticipate the retrial commencing before next year.
Venue presents a contested procedural question. The defense is considering a change-of-venue motion, but the receiving jurisdiction must approximate Colleton County's demographic composition. Griffin noted that Richland and Charleston counties would likely fail that standard. Harpootlian cited the Pee Wee Gaskins precedent regarding individual voir dire necessitated by pretrial publicity saturation.
The Attorney General's reported decision to place the death penalty on the table creates an additional procedural dimension — capital charges automatically trigger individual juror screening, which aligns with the defense's stated preference. The federal civil rights lawsuit against Becky Hill under Section 1983 continues to function as a parallel discovery mechanism. The defense has stated publicly that no plea agreement will be considered.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#AlexMurdaugh #MaggieMurdaugh #DNAEvidence #CODIS #MurdaughRetrial #SLED #Section1983 #BeckyHill #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime

The defense team for Alex Murdaugh filed a federal civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 against former Colleton County Clerk of Court Becky Hill, alleging she deprived the defendant of his constitutional right to a fair trial before an untampered jury. The South Carolina Supreme Court's reversal already found her conduct warranted a new trial. The federal complaint is designed to use civil discovery mechanisms — depositions, document subpoenas, interrogatories, sworn testimony — to investigate the full scope of Hill's actions and determine whether she acted independently.
The complaint highlights the removal of juror Myra Crosby during deliberations as a critical incident requiring deeper examination. Defense counsel Jim Griffin stated publicly that the central question is whether Hill was a lone actor or whether others had knowledge of her conduct. The suit seeks damages exceeding six hundred thousand dollars representing the cost of the original trial, with all recovered funds directed to the receivership — not the defendant.
The defense has argued that the state's investigation of Hill's conduct was inadequate — that it never treated the interference as the constitutional violation the Supreme Court subsequently determined it to be, and never pursued the evidence to its conclusion. The federal action is structured to reach what state-level proceedings did not.
Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta and retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke examine the lawsuit's discovery strategy and its implications for the retrial.
Separately, the defense's retrial strategy is coming into focus. The Supreme Court's published skepticism about twelve hours of financial crimes testimony creates a significant evidentiary constraint for the prosecution. The defense will invoke the court's own language to challenge every financial witness. The physical evidence stands on its own for the first time: no DNA connecting the defendant to the killings, no blood, both weapons unrecovered, no eyewitnesses, and a crime scene compromised by weather and foot traffic. Whether Murdaugh testifies again — likely compelled by the kennel video recording — becomes a fundamentally different calculation without weeks of financial testimony preceding it.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#AlexMurdaugh #BeckyHill #MurdaughRetrial #Section1983 #JuryTampering #CivilDiscovery #BobMotta #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime

The State's sentencing memorandum in the Kouri Richins case documented a pattern of conduct from inside the Summit County Jail that prosecutors argued demonstrated irredeemable character — the legal threshold supporting the maximum sentence.
The memo details what prosecutors describe as a coordinated campaign against every individual connected to the prosecution. Among the documented actions: the creation of a fraudulent dating profile targeting the lead detective, filed reports to the Division of Child and Family Services against the family providing care for her children — which prosecutors characterize as meritless, retained legal counsel to pursue criminal charges against her sister-in-law, initiated federal firearms proceedings against Eric Richins' father for removing his deceased son's firearms from the residence, filed a marijuana-related report concerning Eric's sister, and submitted bar complaints against the prosecuting attorneys — all found to lack substantive basis. The memo also flagged insurance policies on her children's lives.
Judge Richard Mrazik imposed life without parole on what would have been the victim's forty-fourth birthday, following a five-hour sentencing proceeding. The court heard impact testimony from three minor children, delivered through their therapists, describing confinement, neglect, and a household where siblings assumed caretaker roles. The defendant's courtroom demeanor during those readings — visible scoffing and eye-rolling — was documented on camera.
The defendant's forty-minute allocution made no reference to the children's testimony. She characterized their descriptions as "an absolute lie," directed them to emulate the man she was convicted of killing, and instructed them to distrust their current caregivers. Post-conviction communications obtained by the State included a message to an individual described as an "admirer" in which the defendant stated: "They haven't seen anything yet."
The proceeding concluded with a statement from her nine-year-old son: "Once she is gone, I will feel happy."
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#KouriRichins #EricRichins #RichinsSentencing #SentencingMemo #LifeWithoutParole #DARVO #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #ParkCityUtah #JusticeForEric