True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

In true crime, the most damaging evidence is often the kind the defendant created herself. In the Kouri Richins murder trial, the jury has seen phone searches for "fentanyl poisoning" and instructions on deleting messages. They've seen a jailhouse letter where Kouri allegedly tells family members what to say and how to say it. They've heard testimony that the signature on a life insurance policy taken out a month before Eric died likely wasn't his.
And they know that minutes after first responders left the house where Eric lay dead, Kouri's phone accessed deleted memes — one captioned "I'm really rich."
True Crime Today takes a hard look at what that kind of behavioral and digital record does to a defendant in front of a jury. Tony Brueski and Eric Faddis examine the deception pattern the prosecution has built, what it proves legally, and the impossible choice Kouri now faces — testify and try to explain it, or stay silent and let it speak for itself.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#TrueCrimeToday #KouriRichins #EricRichins #TrueCrime #MurderTrial #DigitalEvidence #FentanylPoisoning #CriminalTrial #TrueCrimePodcast #DeceptionEvidence

Forty days. No suspect. No arrest. The cadaver dogs have been stood down, the DNA has dead-ended twice, and the Sonoran Desert doesn't give things back.
True Crime Today takes the Nancy Guthrie case out of the cable news cycle and into the hard statistical reality of what happens to missing persons cases that don't close in the first thirty days. The answer isn't comfortable — but it's what the evidence supports.
After forty days with no viable DNA match, no identified suspect, and no clothing ID on the masked figure from the doorbell footage, the investigation has hit a structural ceiling. The glove DNA traced back to a restaurant worker with no case connection. The mixed crime scene DNA is too complex for a clean extraction. CODIS returned nothing. The FBI is still canvassing neighbors about internet disruptions from the night she disappeared — six weeks later. The unidentified vehicle on the Ring camera remains unidentified.
Every year, roughly 600,000 people go missing in America. About 87 percent of those cases close within 30 days. Cases that don't close in that window enter a different statistical universe — one the reward money and the task force and the national press coverage cannot change. The FBI reported over 97,000 unresolved missing persons cases in a single year alone. In 2024, only 293 entries nationwide were coded as stranger abductions. True stranger abductions are the hardest cases in law enforcement — no shared history, no connection to triangulate, no thread to pull.
Add the Sonoran Desert. Add the border corridor. Add an 84-year-old woman with a cardiac condition and forty days without medication.
The evidence is saying something. This episode says it plainly.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #TucsonKidnapping #MissingPersons #CadaverDogs #DNAEvidence #FBIInvestigation #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #StrangerAbduction

In one of the most watched murder trials in the country right now, the defense just walked away from the table. No witnesses. No counter-evidence. An hour-long recess, and then two words: the defense rests.
Kouri Richins, the Utah mother charged with fatally poisoning her husband Eric Richins with fentanyl in 2022, sat through three weeks of prosecution testimony — 42 witnesses, forged documents, alleged insurance fraud, a housekeeper who prosecutors say obtained the drugs, and a lead investigator who confirmed a lethal dose of fentanyl was found in Eric's stomach despite none being recovered anywhere in the home. When it was her turn, she waived her right to testify. That was the only time she spoke directly to the court.
In today's breakdown, we walk through everything that happened on the final day of testimony — including the legal trap the defense nearly walked into that would have blown open previously suppressed evidence, and the moment the judge told counsel they were playing high-stakes poker. Then we dig into the harder question: is this legal strategy, or is something else going on? What does it mean when a defendant who has been publicly exposed for three weeks chooses silence over defense? And what about the attorneys — the human beings on that side of the table who have also been ground up by three weeks of live-streamed public scrutiny?
Closing arguments are Monday. The jury gets it after that.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#KouriRichins #KouriRichinsTrial #DefenseRests #EricRichins #FentanylMurder #UtahMurderTrial #TrueCrime #TrueCrimeToday #ClosingArguments #MurderTrial

In true crime cases, immunity deals are common. But the Kouri Richins murder trial has a problem that goes beyond any single witness — the prosecution's entire drug supply chain is made up of people who traded their testimony for their freedom.
Carmen Lauber, the housekeeper at the center of the case, had her story expand to include fentanyl after detectives told her she was facing serious federal charges. Robert Crozier, the alleged drug supplier, told investigators he sold fentanyl — then told a different story on the stand. A detective's recorded statements, played for the jury by the defense, raised questions about whether investigators shaped the testimony they needed.
True Crime Today examines what happens when a murder case depends on witnesses whose motivations are anything but clean. Tony Brueski sits down with Eric Faddis — a former prosecutor who now defends the accused — to break down how immunity deals actually function, what the Richins prosecution is facing in closing arguments, and whether a jury can trust a drug chain where every link had something to gain.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#TrueCrimeToday #KouriRichins #EricRichins #ImmunityWitness #TrueCrime #MurderTrial #FentanylPoisoning #CriminalJustice #TrueCrimePodcast #WitnessTestimony

In the Kouri Richins murder case, the defense isn't just arguing Kouri is innocent — they're arguing the man she's accused of killing may have contributed to his own death. It's a strategy that shows up in true crime cases more than most people realize, and it almost always carries serious risk.
Eric Richins' best friend and business partner testified he never saw Eric use drugs in their entire relationship. A toxicologist identified a forensic marker in Eric's system proving the fentanyl was street-grade, not pharmaceutical. And the judge blocked the defense's most direct drug use evidence before the jury ever heard it.
On True Crime Today, Tony Brueski sits down with defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis to examine this strategy from both sides — what the defense is trying to accomplish, why it's dangerous, and whether any part of it creates the reasonable doubt Kouri needs.
They also dig into the open marriage angle, what it means legally, and the central question this whole theory creates: when a jury has already grown to respect a victim, what happens when you start attacking who he was?
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#TrueCrimeToday #KouriRichins #EricRichins #TrueCrime #MurderTrial #FentanylPoisoning #CriminalDefense #TrueCrimePodcast #DefenseStrategy #JuryTrial