True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

Nearly two hundred pastors, youth leaders, and church officials were accused or convicted of crimes against children in 2025 alone. A megachurch founder who served on a presidential evangelical advisory board pleaded guilty to five felony counts involving a twelve-year-old — and got six months. A state legislator who won an award for “protecting children” was distributing CSAM. And now Joseph Duggar — the second Duggar brother to face charges involving a minor — is asking a Florida judge to let him see his kids again because the no-contact order is causing his family “hardship.”
Tony Brueski connects these cases to the biggest contradiction in conservative politics right now: the same movement passing death penalty legislation for crimes against children keeps producing the people those laws were written for. He walks through the Duggar-Huckabee political alliance, the Arkansas law Governor Sanders signed making these crimes a capital offense, the religious framework that turns alleged offenders into redemption stories, and the wall of silence from political allies who have plenty to say about accountability — until it applies to someone they know.
This is a sharp, unflinching opinion piece built on court filings, published emails, and the public record. If these laws don’t apply to the people at your dinner table, they were never about protecting children.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#JosephDuggar #DuggarFamily #TrueCrime #DeathPenalty #JoshDuggar #Huckabee #Arkansas #ChildProtection #HiddenKillers #TrueCrimeToday

When the lead sheriff in a high-profile case stops talking directly to the victim's family more than 100 days in, hands family communication entirely to the FBI, and keeps using vague phrases like "getting closer" without backing them up — that is not a routine moment. That is an inflection point.
Tony Brueski takes the full picture of the Nancy Guthrie investigation to retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer in an extended conversation that pulls every live thread together. The family communication change. The evidence picture. The theories in circulation. All in one place. All read honestly.
Jennifer brings 28 years of Bureau experience — SWAT, organized crime, complex multi-agency casework — and she doesn't soften her reads. She walks through what Sheriff Chris Nanos's decision to step out of direct family contact actually signals about who is running this investigation. She maps the realistic paths from the unknown contributor DNA and the thousands of hours of surveillance footage to an actual arrest, and addresses the lab routing decisions that have been a quiet source of controversy. She then takes on the Wrench Attack theory — the organized crypto-extortion framework that some have suggested might explain Nancy's case — and gives an honest analytical read on whether it holds up.
Across all three threads, Jennifer keeps the same standard. She names what she can support with the publicly available evidence. She names what she cannot. She refuses the performance of certainty when the evidence doesn't support it. For everyone watching this case in real time — and for a Guthrie family still publicly cleared and still offering a $1 million reward — this is the conversation the moment has been waiting for.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ 
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod 
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #ChrisNanos #PimaCountySheriff #FBI #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrueCrimeToday #DNAEvidence #WrenchAttack #SheriffAccountability

The Summit County Sheriff's Office had the case. But they didn't have the phone records — not the way Todd Gabler got them. Because Eric Richins' business paid for the family's phones, Gabler obtained the billing data directly through Eric's business partner. No warrant. No judge. Different rules for a private investigator.
What those records revealed was a communication pattern nobody had flagged. In the months before and after Eric's death, Kouri's third most contacted person wasn't a close friend or a colleague. It was Carmen Lauber — the housekeeper prosecutors now say sourced the fentanyl that ended Eric's life. Lauber had a criminal history. She was testing positive in drug court. And she was exchanging hundreds of messages with Kouri during the exact window the case hinges on.
Gabler saw it first. He flagged it first. And in Part 1 of this exclusive three-part interview, he tells Tony Brueski how a routine look at billing records cracked open a case that law enforcement hadn't been able to move — and what it felt like to realize, as a lifelong defense investigator, that the evidence was pointing somewhere he'd never had to go before.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#KouriRichins #ToddGabler #EricRichins #TrueCrime #FentanylPoisoning #PrivateInvestigator #HiddenKillers #UtahMurderTrial #CarmenLauber #TrueCrimePodcast

In FBI and digital forensic circles, the term "Wrench Attack" refers to a specific kind of organized crime operation — networks that target wealthy individuals or their family members for cryptocurrency ransom, recruit disposable operatives to carry out violent home invasions, and protect the architects behind multiple layers of cutouts that are extraordinarily difficult to trace.
Some people watching the Nancy Guthrie case have raised the question of whether this model could apply. Tony Brueski takes the question to retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer, who has spent 28 years working organized crime and complex investigations and knows the framework inside and out.
Jennifer walks through what a Wrench Attack actually looks like operationally. She talks through the recent Scottsdale crypto-extortion home invasion — two California teens directed by handlers, given seed money — that happened on the same night Nancy disappeared, and what that case shows about how these networks recruit and coordinate. She explains why tracing the digital fingerprints from these operations is so difficult even with the FBI working alongside top forensic experts.
But Jennifer is careful. She doesn't sell the theory. She examines it. She walks through which elements of Nancy's case could loosely align with the pattern, which elements do not align, and what would need to surface publicly before anyone could responsibly conclude the model actually fits.
This is the analytical breakdown the Wrench Attack conversation needs. Tony and Jennifer take the theory seriously enough to examine it on the evidence — and seriously enough to name where the evidence doesn't yet support the conclusion. For anyone who has watched theories take over true crime spaces without that kind of scrutiny, this segment is the antidote.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ 
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod 
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#NancyGuthrie #WrenchAttack #CryptoCrime #BitcoinExtortion #OrganizedCrime #FBI #JenniferCoffindaffer #TrueCrimeToday #TucsonMissing #HomeInvasion

Imagine an officer investigating a suspect in a double child homicide is invited to review surveillance footage that would prove whether the suspect was at work or not. Now imagine the officer declines. According to the defense's appellate filings in the Richard Allen case, that is what happened with one of the most documented alternative suspects in the Delphi murders investigation. This man admitted to pagan rituals involving bloodletting, owned a .40 caliber weapon matching the round found at the crime scene, and had a direct connection to victim Abby Williams. His interview was recorded and then erased. The weapon stayed in his home. Tipsters repeatedly identified him, citing social media posts that, according to the defense, depicted dead girls with sticks over their bodies. An ISP Trooper flagged it and pushed for action. His superiors declined. The suspect's associate told officers he knew the murder woods "very well" and led a local pagan group. That interview wasn't even recorded. His alibi went unchecked for six years. Neither man has ever been charged. The jury never learned they existed. According to the defense filings, the first suspect told his wife his associate had killed Abby "with others." That statement is in the court record. The judge excluded it. This episode documents the alternative suspects, the alibis that fell apart, and the investigative choices that let them walk while Richard Allen was convicted.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#Delphi #RichardAllen #DelphiMurders #AbbyAndLibby #Odinism #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #WrongfulConviction #DelphiInvestigation #JusticeForAbbyAndLibby