True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

A note arrived at a Tucson television station after Nancy Guthrie vanished from her home. It didn't demand money. It didn't make threats. Investigators believed it was real — and kept its contents quiet for months. Now that what it appears to say is public, it may be the most consequential development in the entire case.
It's a legal breakdown with defense attorney Eric Faddis and retired FBI special agent Robin Dreeke.
Tony Brueski digs into the legal weight of that note and what it means for a prosecution that still has no one in custody. Can a message sent anonymously, through a server designed to hide the writer, be used as evidence that a crime ended the way the note describes? What does a prosecutor have to do to turn words on a page into proof in a courtroom?
This is the state's side of a brutally difficult case: no remains, no arrest, and her family still waiting. Tony walks through how circumstantial evidence builds the body of the crime without a body, why felony-murder law could change what prosecutors must prove, and why experts say a case this visible won't wait for a perfect set of facts before someone is charged.
He also lays out the evidence the state already controls — the blood, the pacemaker timestamp, the doorbell footage, the backpack traced to one retailer — and which single piece a smart prosecutor builds the rest of the case around.
The note may be the thread that holds it all together. Or it may be the thread a defense attorney pulls first.
Listen now.

END_LINKS:

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

Disclaimer:

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
Hashtags: #NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #NoBodyHomicide #FelonyMurder #Tucson #PimaCounty #RansomNote #ColdCase

Barry Morphew is heading to trial in October for the murder of his wife, Suzanne Morphew — the second time he’s been charged. The first case fell apart due to prosecutorial misconduct so severe the DA was disbarred. What Barry did between the two prosecutions tells a story with two very different readings.
He moved to Arizona. Used fake names. Lived at a trailer park in Cave Creek under aliases that kept his identity compartmentalized — Bruce at one place, Lee at another. A woman recognized him at a bar and called him by name. He denied it. At the time, Suzanne’s remains had already been found in a shallow grave and an autopsy had identified a restricted wildlife tranquilizer in her bone marrow. Prosecutors would later allege Barry was the only civilian in the area with access to it.
After the grand jury re-indicted him in June 2025 and he pleaded not guilty a second time, Barry allegedly signed paperwork authorizing the release and cremation of Suzanne’s remains — the prosecution’s most important physical evidence. Law enforcement found out and seized the remains one day before cremation was scheduled. Court documents show Barry’s signature on the authorization forms.
Is this the behavior of an innocent man? Or something else entirely? The audience decides.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#BarryMorphew #SuzanneMorphew #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrime #MorphewTrial #BAMTranquilizer #ColdCase #MurderTrial #JusticeForSuzanne #TrueCrimePodcast

Taylor Parker Maternal Instinct Netflix — a state trooper found her on a Texas highway, covered in blood, cradling a dying baby that wasn't hers, selling the story that she'd just given birth. At the hospital, blood work confirmed she had never been pregnant. She couldn't have been. She'd had a hysterectomy. Reagan Simmons-Hancock — twenty-one years old, eight months pregnant — was found dead in her home with over a hundred stab wounds.
This is the full three-part conversation between Tony Brueski and psychotherapist Shavaun Scott on the Taylor Parker case featured in Netflix's Maternal Instinct. All three segments. All three lanes. Uncut.
The first segment examines Taylor's pattern of deception — fabricated illnesses going back years before the fake pregnancy, the fixation on a friend's pregnancy that forced Taylor to relocate and start over, and the question of whether the person people thought they knew ever actually existed.
The second segment puts Wade Griffin's responsibility on the table. Multiple people warned him the pregnancy was impossible. He chose Taylor. He cashed fake checks. He went into debt. He said out loud that things were moving too fast. And he kept going. His community has its own verdict. Reagan's widower has his.
The third segment examines the system that failed. The doctor who knew and couldn't speak. The father who watched the gender reveal in silence. The mother who assumed the truth would surface on its own. The privacy laws and pandemic restrictions that ensured it wouldn't.
Three segments, three lanes, one conversation that covers more ground than the documentary.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#MaternalInstinct #TaylorParker #TrueCrimeToday #ReaganHancock #ShavaunScott #Netflix #WadeGriffin #TrueCrime #DeathRow #FakePregnancy

The protective custody theory says the FBI has Nancy Guthrie hidden somewhere safe. On June 9th, Pima County reclassified the case as a no-body homicide investigation. Prosecutors have begun preparing the groundwork to bring charges without recovered remains. That single development makes the protective custody theory structurally impossible. A homicide reclassification is a legal act with real consequences. Prosecutors who build a no-body murder case are putting their careers and legal standing behind the assertion that the person was killed. If Nancy were alive in a federal facility somewhere, every prosecutor involved would be knowingly constructing a fraudulent legal proceeding. Their bar licenses would be on the line. And the entire operational footprint of the investigation contradicts the theory independently. Over 150 agents deployed. Ground searches through drainage ditches and culverts. A helicopter with pacemaker signal detection equipment. DNA submitted to CODIS and processed through multiple independent labs. Tens of thousands of tips catalogued. Every person who touched evidence in this case would have to be part of the deception. Tony Brueski examines why this theory exists, why some people need it to be true, and why the evidence makes it impossible — not unlikely, impossible.

Links:

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

Disclaimer:

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

Hashtags:

#NancyGuthrie #NancyGuthrieUpdate #TrueCrimeToday #FindingNancy #TrueCrime #GuthrieCase #NancyGuthrieHomicide #TrueCrimePodcast #SavannahGuthrie #NancyGuthrieFBI

Taylor Parker Maternal Instinct Netflix — five people knew Taylor Parker's pregnancy was a lie. Her doctor. Her mother. Her father. Her aunt. Her ex-husband. Between them, they had every fact needed to prevent what happened to Reagan Simmons-Hancock. Not one of them was able to stop it.
The doctor who performed Taylor's hysterectomy — and who watched her post stolen ultrasound images from his own office — testified he was legally prevented from disclosing her medical history to anyone. The best the clinic could offer was five words: "Just go with your gut."
Taylor's father attended her gender reveal knowing the baby wasn't real. Her mother testified "we figured the lie would be exposed." Her aunt was blocked on social media after attempting to intervene. Her ex-husband reached out to Wade's brother and was dismissed.
Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott takes on the systemic side of the Taylor Parker case. Privacy laws designed to protect patients protected a woman orchestrating a lie that would end in murder. Pandemic restrictions that were supposed to keep people safe gave Taylor unquestioned cover for nine months. And a family who all independently knew the truth all independently decided it wasn't their responsibility to act.
Wade Griffin's friend Stephanie Ott made every call, found proof, and pushed against every wall the system put up. The lab wouldn't help. The clinic couldn't talk. Privacy laws had every door locked.
This conversation examines the gap between what people believe they would do in this situation and what the system actually allows them to do. The answer is harder than anybody watching the documentary wants to hear.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#MaternalInstinct #TaylorParker #TrueCrimeToday #ReaganHancock #ShavaunScott #Netflix #GenderReveal #TrueCrime #WadeGriffin #SystemFailure