Everyone has read Entangled Life, the wonderfully-written book aboit fungi that took the world by storm about 5 years ago. Among many other things, it popularised the “wood wide web”—the idea that trees can communicate with one another through networks of fungi at their roots.But is the wood wide web real? It turns out scientists have some major questions. We air them on this episode.And just to be completely clear, there are no personal vendettas here! Everyone recording this podcast is 100% free of “beefs” of all kinds. Even the co-host who was beaten in a book contest by the aforementioned mushroom book.The Science Fictions podcast is brought to you by Works in Progress magazine. Their most recent article is about the wonderful invention (and history) of the dishwasher, one of several incredible labour-saving devices that have made so many lives just a bit less dull. Read this, and so many more stories about human progress, at worksinprogress.co.Show notes* Entangled Life by Merlin Sheldrake* Winner of the 2021 Royal Society book award* Rupert Sheldrake and the concept of “morphic resonance”* Suzanne Simard’s TED talk about “how trees talk to each other”* Her 1997 paper on “net transfer of carbon”* 2023 paper by Karst et al.: “Positive citation bias and overinterpreted results lead to misinformation on common mycorrhizal networks in forests”* Nature piece following the 2023 paper* 2015 paper on “stress signaling” via fungal networks* 2023 paper on tree proximity* Simard’s response to Karst et al.CreditsThe Science Fictions podcast is produced by Julian Mayers at Yada Yada Productions. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit sciencefictionspod.substack.com/subscribe
--------
1:01:28
--------
1:01:28
Episode 90: Cognitive dissonance
It has happened again. A new paper, based on a tranche of unsealed historical documents, casts serious doubt on a piece of social psychology research from the mid-20th Century. Shocker!This time it’s about some of the fundamental inspirations for the idea of cognitive dissonance—the idea that holding contradictory views in one’s head creates discomfort and a need to change one of the beliefs. So what does the new historical research say? What about all the studies that claim to find evidence for cognitive dissonance—surely the whole thing isn’t a load of nonsense? Listen to this episode to find out.The Science Fictions podcast is brought to you by Works in Progress magazine. They’ve recently been publishing a whole host of podcasts, including the one we mentioned this week, on “the economics of the baby bust” (that’s the opposite of a baby boom, by the way). You can find it and many other podcasts at podcast.worksinprogress.co. Show notes* The new paper, “Debunking When Prophecy Fails”* And the related paper “Failed Prophecies are Fatal”* The lobotomy article in the Washington Post* Scott Alexander on using facts to persuade* Dan Engber on the same* Matti Heino on the original Festinger & Carlsmith (1959) paper* The paper itself* The GRIM test (with an online tool to do it yourself)* 2024 multi-lab replication attempt on cognitive dissonance* 1983 study that was replicatedCreditsThe Science Fictions podcast is produced by Julian Mayers at Yada Yada Productions. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit sciencefictionspod.substack.com/subscribe
--------
1:05:04
--------
1:05:04
Paid-only episode 24: Creatine
This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit sciencefictionspod.substack.comCreatine is the supplement of the moment, but both of us had vaguely heard that this one might actually not be total garbage.On the other hand: there are a lot of surprising claims made about it! If proponents are to be believed, it doesn’t just boost muscle mass – it reduces depression, prevents cancer, and improves your cognitive function.How much of this should we believe, and how much is it just a big load of crap? We thought we would take a look.
--------
11:03
--------
11:03
Episode 89: Halloween special on reincarnation
Around these parts, we have a tradition to do a paranormal episode at Halloween. We’ve done psychic powers, ghosts, and now… reincarnation. What are we to make of the stories—sometimes told in NYT-bestselling books—of children who appear to remember details of their past lives? What about the many peer-reviewed scientific papers that claim that something supernatural is going on here? In this EXTRA-SPOOKY episode, we find out.🎃 Happy Halloween! 🎃The Science Fictions podcast is brought to you by WoooOOOOOooooOOOOorks in ProoooooOOOOOooooooOOOOOooogress magazine, which is bursting with historical stories, policy ideas, and well-written scientific explanations, all focused on the topic of progress. You can find all of Works in Progress—essays, shorter pieces, podcasts, and even the chance to subscribe to the print edition—at worksinprogress.co.Show notes* The University of Virginia’s Department of Perceptual Studies* And the University of Edinburgh’s Koestler Parapsychology Unit* Jim Tucker, child psychologist and reincarnation researcher* Tucker’s 2025 paper on the >2,500 reported cases of reincarnation* 2024 review of cases on the “reincarnation birthmark” issue* Michael Sudduth’s 94-page debunking of the James Leininger case* Response from Jim Tucker on Leininger* Reply from Sudduth* Sudduth’s blog post on the same issue* Steven Novella on memory, children’s learning, and supposed reincarnationCreditsThe Science Fictions podcast is produced by Julian Mayers at Yada Yada Productions. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit sciencefictionspod.substack.com/subscribe
--------
1:02:37
--------
1:02:37
Episode 88: Wellbeing
Maybe it’s the most important thing any scientist can study: what makes people happy? The trouble is, despite the importance, a lot of the science on “wellbeing” tends to be very rickety.But did you know that even one of the best-known findings of wellbeing research—the midlife crisis, or “inverted U shape” of happiness over the lifespan—has been questioned? In this episode we discuss the controversy.The Science Fictions podcast is brought to you by Works in Progress magazine. At worksinprogress.co you can read issue after issue of fascinating articles bursting with ideas on how humans made scientific and technological progress in the past, and how we can keep it going. You can also check out their selection of other podcasts at podcast.worksinprogress.co. Show notes* The American Psychologist paper that claimed to reveal the fluid dynamics of human happiness* Nick Brown and Alan Sokal’s devastating rebuttal* And coverage in The Guardian at the time* David Blanchflower’s original work on the inverted U-shape of happiness* And subsequent work that backs it up…* …and subsequent work that does not back it up* New paper that tries to work out why there are differing results* Afghanistan reporting the lowest wellbeing in recorded history* Our previous episode on the weird phenomenon of collider biasCreditsWe’re grateful to Dr. Julia Rohrer of Leipzig University for talking to us for this episode (though as usual, if there are mistakes, they’re ours and not hers). The Science Fictions podcast is produced by Julian Mayers at Yada Yada Productions. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit sciencefictionspod.substack.com/subscribe
Brasil