PodcastsCiênciaThe Information Bottleneck

The Information Bottleneck

Ravid Shwartz-Ziv & Allen Roush
The Information Bottleneck
Último episódio

30 episódios

  • The Information Bottleneck

    Diffusion LLM & Why the Future of AI Won't Be Autoregressive - Stefano Ermon (Stanford /Inception)

    19/03/2026 | 49min
    In this episode, we talk with Stefano Ermon,  Stanford professor, co-founder & CEO of Inception AI, and co-inventor of DDIM, FlashAttention, DPO, and score-based/diffusion models, about why diffusion-based language models may overtake the autoregressive paradigm that dominates today's LLMs.

    We start with the fundamental topics, such as what diffusion models actually are, and why iterative refinement (starting from noise, progressively denoising) offers structural advantages over autoregressive generation.
    From there,  we dive into the technical core of diffusion LLMs. Stefano explains how discrete diffusion works on text, why masking is just one of many possible noise processes, and how the mathematics of score matching carries over from the continuous image setting with surprising elegance.
    A major theme is the inference advantage. Because diffusion models produce multiple tokens in parallel, they can be dramatically faster than autoregressive models at inference time. Stefano argues this fundamentally changes the cost-quality Pareto frontier, and becomes especially powerful in RL-based post-training.
    We also discuss Inception AI's Mercury II model, which Stefano describes as best-in-class for latency-constrained tasks like voice agents and code completion.
    In the final part, we get into broader questions  - why transformers work so well, research advice for PhD students, whether recursive self-improvement is imminent, the real state of AI coding tools, and Stefano's journey from academia to startup founder.

    TIMESTAMPS
    0:12 – Introduction
    1:08 – Origins of diffusion models: from GANs to score-based models in 2019
    3:13 – Diffusion vs. autoregressive: the typewriter vs. editor analogy
    4:43 – Speed, creativity, and quality trade-offs between the two approaches
    7:44 – Temperature and sampling in diffusion LLMs — why it's more subtle than you think
    9:56 – Can diffusion LLMs scale? Inception AI and Gemini Diffusion as proof points
    11:50 – State space models and hybrid transformer architectures
    13:03 – Scaling laws for diffusion: pre-training, post-training, and test-time compute
    14:33 – Ecosystem and tooling: what transfers and what doesn't
    16:58 – From images to text: how discrete diffusion actually works
    19:59 – Theory vs. practice in deep learning
    21:50 – Loss functions and scoring rules for generative models
    23:12 – Mercury II and where diffusion LLMs already win
    26:20 – Creativity, slop, and output diversity in parallel generation
    28:43 – Hardware for diffusion models: why current GPUs favor autoregressive workloads
    30:56 – Optimization algorithms and managing technical risk at a startup
    32:46 – Why do transformers work so well?
    33:30 – Research advice for PhD students: focus on inference
    34:57 – Recursive self-improvement and AGI timelines
    35:56 – Will AI replace software engineers? Real-world experience at Inception
    37:54 – Professor vs. startup founder: different execution, similar mission
    39:56 – The founding story of Inception AI — from ICML Best Paper to company
    42:30 – The researcher-to-founder pipeline and big funding rounds
    45:02 – PhD vs. industry in 2026: the widening financial gap
    47:30 – The industry in 5-10 years: Stefano's outlook
    Music:
    "Kid Kodi" - Blue Dot Sessions - via Free Music Archive - CC BY-NC 4.0.
    "Palms Down" - Blue Dot Sessions - via Free Music Archive - CC BY-NC 4.0.
    Changes: trimmed
    About: The Information Bottleneck is hosted by Ravid Shwartz-Ziv and Allen Roush, featuring in-depth conversations with leading AI researchers about the ideas shaping the future of machine learning.
  • The Information Bottleneck

    Training Is Nothing Like Learning with Naomi Saphra (Harvard)

    13/03/2026 | 1h 11min
    Naomi Saphra, Kempner Research Fellow at Harvard and incoming Assistant Professor at Boston University, joins us to explain why you can't do interpretability without understanding training dynamics,  in the same way you can't do biology without evolution.
    Naomi argues that many structures researchers find inside trained models are vestigial, they mattered early in training but are meaningless by the end. Grokking is one case of a broader phenomenon: models go through multiple consecutive phase transitions during training, driven by symmetry breaking and head specialization, but the smooth loss curve hides all of it. We talk about why training is nothing like human learning, and why our intuitions about what's hard for models are consistently wrong  -  code in pretraining helps language reasoning, tokenization drives behaviors people attribute to deeper cognition, and language already encodes everything humans care about. We also get into why SAEs are basically topic models, the Platonic representation hypothesis, using AI to decode animal communication, and why non-determinism across training runs is a real problem that RL and MoE might be making worse.
    Timeline:
    (00:12) Introduction and guest welcome
    (01:01) Why training dynamics matter - the evolutionary biology analogy
    (03:05) Jennifer Aniston neurons and the danger of biological parallels
    (04:48) What is grokking and why it's one instance of a broader phenomenon
    (08:25) Phase transitions, symmetry breaking, and head specialization
    (11:53) Double descent, overfitting, and the death of classical train-test splits
    (15:10) Training is nothing like learning
    (16:08) Scaling axes - data, model size, compute, and why they're not interchangeable
    (19:29) Data quality, code as reasoning fuel, and GPT-2's real contribution
    (20:43) Multilingual models and the interlingua hypothesis
    (25:58) The Platonic representation hypothesis and why image classification was always multimodal
    (29:12) Sparse autoencoders, interpretability, and Marr's levels
    (37:32) Can we ever truly understand what models know?
    (43:59) The language modality chauvinist argument
    (51:55) Vision, redundancy, and self-supervised learning
    (57:18) World models - measurable capabilities over philosophical definitions
    (1:00:14) Is coding really a solved task?
    (1:04:18) Non-determinism, scaling laws, and why one training run isn't enough
    (1:10:12) Naomi's new lab at BU and recruiting

    Music:
    "Kid Kodi" - Blue Dot Sessions - via Free Music Archive - CC BY-NC 4.0.
    "Palms Down" - Blue Dot Sessions - via Free Music Archive - CC BY-NC 4.0.
    Changes: trimmed

    About: The Information Bottleneck is hosted by Ravid Shwartz-Ziv and Allen Roush, featuring in-depth conversations with leading AI researchers about the ideas shaping the future of machine learning.
  • The Information Bottleneck

    EP28: How to Control a Stochastic Agent with Stefano Soatto (VP AWS/ Pro. UCLA)

    06/03/2026 | 1h 2min
    Stefano Soatto, VP for AI at AWS and Professor at UCLA, the person responsible for agentic AI at AWS, joins us to explain why building reliable AI agents is fundamentally a control theory problem.
    Stefano sees LLMs as stochastic dynamical systems that need to be controlled, not just prompted. He introduces "strands coding," a new framework AWS is building that sits between vibe coding and spec coding, you write a skeleton with AI functions constrained by pre- and post-conditions, verifying intent before a single line of code is generated. The surprising part: even as AI coding adoption goes up, developer trust in the output is going down.
    We go deep into the philosophy of models and the world. Stefano argues that the dichotomy between "language models" and "world models" doesn't really exist, where a reasoning engine trained on rich enough data is a world model. He walks us through why naive realism is indefensible, how reverse diffusion was originally intended to show that models can't be identical to reality, and why that matters now.
    We also discuss three types of information, Shannon, algorithmic, and conceptual, and why algorithmic information is the one that actually matters to agents. Synthetic data doesn't add Shannon information, but it adds algorithmic information, which is why it works. Intelligence isn't about scaling to Solomonov's universal induction; it's about learning to solve new problems fast.

    Takeaways:
    Vibe coding is local feedback control with high cognitive load; spec coding is open-loop global control with silent failures, neither scales well alone.
    Trust in AI-generated code is declining even as adoption rises.
    The distinction between next-token prediction and world model is mostly nomenclature - reasoning engines operating on multimodal data are world models.
    Algorithmic information, not Shannon information, is what matters in the agentic setting.
    Intelligence isn't minimizing inference uncertainty - it's minimizing time to solve unforeseen tasks.
    The intent gap between user and model cannot be fully automated or delegated.

    Timeline
    (00:13) Introduction and guest welcome
    (01:12) How the agentic era changed machine learning
    (06:11) Vibe coding one year later
    (07:23) Vibe vs. spec vs. strands coding
    (14:30) Why English is not a programming language
    (16:36) Constrained generation and agent choreography
    (20:44) Diffusion models vs. autoregressive models (25:59) The platonic representation hypothesis and naive realism
    (31:14) Synthetic data and the information bottleneck
    (36:22) Three types of information: Shannon, algorithmic, conceptual
    (38:47) Scaling laws and Solomonov induction
    (42:14) World models and the Goethian vs. Marrian approach
    (49:00) Encoding vs. generation and JEPA-style training
    (55:50) Are language models already world models?
    (59:13) Closing thoughts on trust, education, and responsibility.

    Music:
    "Kid Kodi" - Blue Dot Sessions - via Free Music Archive - CC BY-NC 4.0.
    "Palms Down" - Blue Dot Sessions - via Free Music Archive - CC BY-NC 4.0. Changes: trimmed
    About
    The Information Bottleneck is hosted by Ravid Shwartz-Ziv and Allen Roush, featuring in-depth conversations with leading AI researchers about the ideas shaping the future of machine learning.
  • The Information Bottleneck

    EP27: Medical Foundation Models - with Tanishq Abraham (Sophont.AI)

    02/03/2026 | 1h 25min
    Tanishq Abraham, CEO and co-founder of Sophont.ai, joins us to talk about building foundation models specifically for medicine.
    Sophont is trying to be something like an OpenAI or Anthropic but for healthcare  - training models across pathology, neuroimaging, and clinical text, to eventually fuse them into one multimodal system. The surprising part: their pathology model trained on 12,000 public slides performs on par with models trained on millions of private ones. Data quality beats data quantity.
    We talk about what actually excites Tanishq, which is not replacing doctors, but finding things doctors can't see. AI predicting gene mutations from a tissue slide, or cardiovascular risk from an eye scan.
    We also talk about the regulation and how the picture is less scary than people assume. Text-based clinical decision support can ship without FDA approval. Pharma partnerships offer near-term impact. The five-to-ten-year timeline people fear is really about drug discovery, not all of medical AI.

    Takeaways:
    The real promise of medical AI is finding hidden signals in existing data, not just automating doctors
    Small, curated public datasets can rival massive private ones
    Multimodal fusion is the goal, but you need strong individual encoders first
    AI research itself might get automated sooner than biology or chemistry
    FDA regulation has more flexibility than most people think

    Timeline
    (00:12) Introduction and guest welcome
    (02:32) Anthropic's ad about ChatGPT ads
    (07:26) XAI merging into SpaceX
    (13:32) Vibe coding one year later
    (17:00) Claude Code and agentic workflows
    (21:52) Can AI automate AI research?
    (26:57) What is medical AI
    (31:06) Sofont as a frontier medical AI lab
    (33:52) Public vs. private data - 12K slides vs. millions
    (36:43) Domain expertise vs. scaling
    (41:54) Cancer, diabetes, and personal stakes
    (47:52) Classification vs. prediction in medicine
    (50:36) When doctors disagree
    (54:43) Quackery and AI
    (57:15) Uncertainty in medical AI
    (1:03:11) Will AI replace doctors?
    (1:07:24) Self-supervised learning on sleep data
    (1:10:10) Aligning modalities
    (1:13:17) FDA regulation
    (1:22:28) Closing

    Music:
    "Kid Kodi" - Blue Dot Sessions - via Free Music Archive - CC BY-NC 4.0.
    "Palms Down" - Blue Dot Sessions - via Free Music Archive - CC BY-NC 4.0.
    Changes: trimmed

    About
    The Information Bottleneck is hosted by Ravid Shwartz-Ziv and Allen Roush, featuring in-depth conversations with leading AI researchers about the ideas shaping the future of machine learning.
  • The Information Bottleneck

    EP26: Measuring Intelligence in the Wild - Arena and the Future of AI Evaluation

    24/02/2026 | 44min
    Anastasios Angelopoulos, Co-Founder and CEO of Arena AI (formerly LMArena), joins us to talk about why static benchmarks are failing, how human preference data actually works under the hood, and what it takes to be the "gold standard" of AI evaluation.
    Anastasios sits at a fascinating intersection -   a theoretical statistician running the platform that every major lab watches when they release a model. We talk about the messiness of AI-generated code slop (yes, he hides Claude's commits too), then dig into the statistical machinery that powers Arena's leaderboards and why getting evaluation right is harder than most people think.
    We explore why style control is both necessary and philosophically tricky, where you can regress away markdown headers and response length, but separating style from substance is a genuinely unsolved causal inference problem. We also get into why users are surprisingly good judges of model quality, how Arena serves as a pre-release testing ground for labs shipping stealth models under codenames, and whether the fragmentation of the AI market (Anthropic going enterprise, OpenAI going consumer, everyone going multimodal) is actually a feature, not a bug. Plus, we discuss the role of rigorous statistics in the age of "just run it again," why structured decoding can hurt model performance, and what Arena's 2026 roadmap looks like.

    Timeline:
    (00:12) Introduction and Anastasios's Background
    (00:55) What Arena Does and Why Static Benchmarks Aren't Enough
    (02:26) Coverage of Use Cases - Is There Enough?
    (04:22) Style Control and the Bradley-Terry Methodology
    (08:35) Can You Actually Separate Style from Substance?
    (10:24) Measuring Slop - And the Anti-Slop Paper Plug
    (11:52) Can Users Judge Factual Correctness?
    (13:31) Tool Use and Agentic Evaluation on Arena
    (14:14) Intermediate Feedback Signals Beyond Final Preference
    (15:30) Tool Calling Accuracy and Code Arena
    (17:42) AI-Generated Code Slop and Hiding Claude's Commits
    (19:49) Do We Need Separate Code Streams for Humans and LLMs?
    (20:01) RL Flywheels and Arena's Preference Data
    (21:16) Focus as a Startup - Being the Evaluation Company
    (22:16) Structured vs. Unconstrained Generation
    (25:00) The Role of Rigorous Statistics in the Age of AI
    (29:23) LLM Sampling Parameters and Evaluation Complexity
    (30:56) Model Versioning and the Frequentist Approach to Fairness
    (32:12) Quantization and Its Effects on Model Quality
    (33:10) Pre-Release Testing and Stealth Models (34:23) Transparency - What to Share with the Public vs. Labs
    (36:27) When Winning Models Don't Get Released
    (36:59) Why Users Keep Coming Back to Arena
    (38:19) Market Fragmentation and Arena's Future Value
    (39:37) Custom Evaluation Frameworks for Specific Users
    (40:03) Arena's 2026 Roadmap - Science, Methodology, and New Paradigms
    (42:15) The Economics of Free Inference
    (43:13) Hiring and Closing Thoughts

    Music:
    "Kid Kodi" — Blue Dot Sessions — via Free Music Archive — CC BY-NC 4.0.
    "Palms Down" — Blue Dot Sessions — via Free Music Archive — CC BY-NC 4.0.
    Changes: trimmed

    About:
    The Information Bottleneck is hosted by Ravid Shwartz-Ziv and Allen Roush, featuring in-depth conversations with leading AI researchers about the ideas shaping the future of machine learning.

Mais podcasts de Ciência

Sobre The Information Bottleneck

Two AI Researchers - Ravid Shwartz Ziv, and Allen Roush, discuss the latest trends, news, and research within Generative AI, LLMs, GPUs, and Cloud Systems.
Site de podcast

Ouça The Information Bottleneck, Os três elementos e muitos outros podcasts de todo o mundo com o aplicativo o radio.net

Obtenha o aplicativo gratuito radio.net

  • Guardar rádios e podcasts favoritos
  • Transmissão via Wi-Fi ou Bluetooth
  • Carplay & Android Audo compatìvel
  • E ainda mais funções
Informação legal
Aplicações
Social
v8.8.2 | © 2007-2026 radio.de GmbH
Generated: 3/20/2026 - 5:33:48 AM