Sigma Nutrition Radio

This episode centers on the critical gap in nutrition education within medical training and efforts to bridge it. Guest Akash Patel, a medical student who led a pilot nutrition curriculum, discusses why doctors receive little formal training in nutrition despite poor diet being a major driver of disease. With diet-related conditions (obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, etc.) contributing heavily to morbidity and healthcare costs, the conversation highlights a pivotal push to better equip physicians in nutritional knowledge and counseling. Patel's work comes at a turning point: there are now calls for standardized nutrition competencies in medical education (e.g., a recent JAMA consensus) and a growing recognition that improving doctors' nutrition literacy could enhance patient care and public trust. But at the same time, medical programs already have a huge workload and little space is available for appropriate training. Others state that nutrition shouldn't fall within the remit of doctors. So how do we reconcile all this? While this episode focuses on the United States context, the concepts apply to other countries, as it outlines both the challenges and the emerging solutions for closing the nutrition training gap in medicine. Timestamps [03:21] Akash Patel's background and interests [05:22] Current state of nutrition education in medical schools [07:55] Akash's pilot program and initial findings [13:37] Challenges and considerations for curriculum integration [15:11] Effective curriculum design for nutrition education [23:38] Debating the role of nutrition education in medical training [29:00] Practical scenarios and the role of doctors [33:58] Advice for implementing nutrition education initiatives [38:15] Future directions in nutrition and medicine [43:07] Key ideas segment Links & Resources Go to episode page (with studies listed & linked) Join the Sigma email newsletter for free Subscribe to Sigma Nutrition Premium Enroll in the next cohort of our Applied Nutrition Literacy course Instagram: @withakashpatel @dannylennon_sigma @sigmanutrition

Never before has there been greater access to information about nutrition and health. But never before has there been such a low barrier to being seen as an "expert". There are large numbers of people getting information from, and basing their health decisions on, people who don't have direct expertise in the field in which they are talking about. Moreover, some promote the lack of domain expertise as a feature, not a bug. They claim that those that were conventionally seen as domain experts are either brainwashed, lazy in their thinking, or outright corrupt. And the solution is instead to look to those with a fresh perspective that can illuminate us on the "truth". In this episode, Alan and Danny discuss this "death of domain expertise", how it plays out online, and its ramifications for people's ability to get good information. Note: This episode was originally published as an exclusive episode for Sigma Nutrition Premium subscribers. If you wish to get more Premium-only episode or read study notes to our episodes, you can subscribe to Sigma Nutrition Premium. Timestamps [03:21] The manufactured collapse of expertise [09:58] Understanding domain specific expertise [15:10] Cross domain expertise and its limits [33:07] The illusion of learning from popular podcasts [38:26] The problem with self-proclaimed experts [46:11] The challenge of identifying true expertise [50:39] The impact of institutional distrust [56:30] Navigating the information landscape Links Go to episode page Join the Sigma email newsletter for free Subscribe to Sigma Nutrition Premium Alan Flanagan's Alinea Nutrition Education Hub  Enroll in the next cohort of our Applied Nutrition Literacy course Mentioned books & studies: Tom Nichols – The Death of Expertise Jonathan Haidt – The Righteous Mind Ionnidis, 2018 – The Challenge of Reforming Nutritional Epidemiologic Research

This is a Premium-exclusive episode of the podcast. To listen to the full episode you need to be subscribed to Sigma Nutrition Premium. Each year, the conversations on Sigma Nutrition Radio aim to examine the ideas that shape how we understand nutrition, health, and human behavior. This episode brings together the key insights from those discussions, revisiting the most important themes, emerging evidence, and shifts in understanding from the past year. Across topics such as dietary guidelines, ultra-processed foods, sleep, metabolism, environmental exposures, and the psychology of eating, this review distills what the science actually shows and what remains uncertain. Whether you have followed throughout the year or are tuning in for the first time, this episode provides a concise synthesis of what truly mattered and what these ideas imply for how we interpret nutrition science moving forward. Timestamps [02:23] Christopher Gardner, PhD – How dietary guidelines are shaped, misused, and what the evidence really supports. [13:10] Marie-Pierre St-Onge, PhD – The bidirectional relationship between sleep quality, circadian timing, and diet. [20:03] Duane Mellor, PhD – Rethinking ultra-processed foods: mechanisms, misconceptions, and policy realism. [29:26] Samuel Dicken, PhD – The UPDATE trial and what nutrient-matched processing tells us about satiety and intake. [35:37] Ian Mudway, PhD – Microplastics, pollution, and why evidence must outrun public fear. [43:46] Martin Caraher, PhD – The financialization of food systems and its impact on inequality and diet quality. Related Resources Go to the episode page Join the Sigma email newsletter for free Subscribe to Sigma Nutrition Premium Enroll in the next cohort of our Applied Nutrition Literacy course

We take a look at critical thinking in science and healthcare, examining how we often fall prey to cognitive biases, emotional reasoning, and flawed thinking. Drawing from six different experts in their respective fields, the episode explores why we sometimes believe we are being rational when in fact our conclusions aren't truly evidence-based. The discussion spans what genuine evidence-based practice means, how domain expertise matters, and how factors like identity, beliefs, and emotions can derail objective reasoning. Timestamps [02:56] Dr. David Nunan on evidence-based medicine [15:30] Dr. John Kiely on translating research into practice [26:10] Dr. Gil Carvallo on emotion and decision making [30:10] Dr. David Robert Grimes on webs of belief [37:18] Dr. Matthew Facciani identity and belief formation [42:31] Dr. Alan Flanagan on domain-specific expertise in nutrition science Related Resources Go to episode page Join the Sigma email newsletter for free Subscribe to Sigma Nutrition Premium Enroll in the next cohort of our Applied Nutrition Literacy course Alan Flanagan's Alinea Nutrition Education Hub

How should we think about diets that claim to optimise both human and planetary health? Can a single "reference diet" really balance the complex trade-offs between nutrition adequacy, chronic disease prevention, and environmental sustainability? These questions have gained renewed attention with the release of the 2025 update to the EAT-Lancet Planetary Health Diet. The original 2019 report proposed a mostly plant-based dietary pattern designed to improve population health while staying within planetary boundaries. But since then, new data have emerged—on nutrient requirements, disease risk, and environmental modelling—that complicate many of the original assumptions. What does the updated evidence actually say about the health impacts of eating in line with this framework? How have the environmental projections changed? And what do these evolving targets mean for individuals, policymakers, and researchers trying to translate broad sustainability goals into practical dietary guidance? These are some of the questions explored in this episode of Sigma Nutrition, which examines the 2025 EAT-Lancet update, its scientific foundations, and what it reveals about the intersection of nutrition, health, and planetary sustainability. Timestamps [01:46] Focus on the 2025 EAT-Lancet report [02:27] Overview of the Planetary Health Diet [03:13] Comparing 2019 and 2025 reports [03:40] Dietary recommendations and nutrient targets [04:14] Health and environmental impacts [09:12] Scoring methods and dietary patterns [27:00] Mortality and chronic disease outcomes [40:01] Type 2 diabetes [44:13] Neuroimaging and cognitive outcomes [49:48] Conclusions and practical implications [58:55] Key ideas segment (Premium-only) Links & Resources Go to episode page (with links to studies) Join the Sigma email newsletter for free Subscribe to Sigma Nutrition Premium Alan Flanagan's Alinea Nutrition Education Hub Enroll in the next cohort of our Applied Nutrition Literacy course Report: EAT-Lancet